Henricks v. California Public Utilities Commission et al

Filing 17

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice and without leave to amend. Additionally, the Court denies Defendants' motion for sanctions.(rmc)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Ruth Henricks, an Individual
Civil Action No. 17cv2177-MMA(MDD)
Plaintiff,
V.
California Public Utilities Commission, a
California state agency; Michael Picker,
President of the California Public
Utilities Commission; DOES 1-100,
Defendant.
Inclusive

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice and without leave to amend. See Hamamoto v. Ige, No.
14-CV-491 DKW, 2015 WL 770346, at *9 n.6 (D. Haw. Feb. 23, 2015) (denying the plaintiff’s request
for leave to amend where the plaintiff’s claims are moot because it would be futile to allow an
amended complaint that lacks subject matter jurisdiction), aff’d, 881 F.3d 719 (9th Cir. 2018).
Additionally, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for sanctions.

Date:

5/18/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ R. Chapman
R. Chapman, Deputy