ESI Group et al v. Wave Six, LLC et al
Filing
168
ORDER granting 165 Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion to Strike and Striking ECF Nos. 164 and 164-1. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 9/02/2021. (jpp)
Case 3:17-cv-02293-TWR-MSB Document 168 Filed 09/03/21 PageID.13595 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
ESI GROUP, a foreign corporation; ESI
NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Michigan
corporation; and ESI US R&D, INC., a
Michigan corporation,
Case No.: 17-CV-2293 TWR (MSB)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STRIKE
AND STRIKING ECF NOS. 164 AND
164-1
Plaintiffs,
14
15
v.
16
WAVE SIX, LLC, a California limited
liability company; DASSAULT
SYSTEMES SIMULIA CORP., a foreign
corporation; PHILIP SHORTER, an
individual; VINCENT COTONI; an
individual; SASCHA MERZ, an
individual; and TERENCE CONNELLY,
an individual,
17
18
19
20
21
22
(ECF No. 164, 164-1, 165)
Defendants.
23
24
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs ESI Group; ESI North America, Inc; and ESI
25
US R&R, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Docket Entries 164 and 164-1 and Remove Their Images
26
from the Docket (“Mot.,” ECF No. 165), which Defendants do not oppose. (See id. at 1.)
27
Plaintiffs explain that they inadvertently filed confidential information subject to the
28
Parties Protective Order (ECF No. 46 Ex. 1) in those particular docket entries, which
1
17-CV-2293 TWR (MSB)
Case 3:17-cv-02293-TWR-MSB Document 168 Filed 09/03/21 PageID.13596 Page 2 of 2
1
Defendants’ counsel brought to their attention. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS
2
the Motion. The Clerk of Court SHALL STRIKE ECF Nos. 164 and 164-1 and SHALL
3
REMOVE their images from the docket. Plaintiffs MAY REFILE the their Memorandum
4
of Contentions of Fact and Law and Witness List and Exhibit List without the confidential
5
information.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: September 2, 2021
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
17-CV-2293 TWR (MSB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?