Grayton v. State of California et al

Filing 12

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendants motion to dismiss based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is Granted. The complaint is Dismissed without leave to amend in this Court, but without prejudice to re-filing in state court. It is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Maurice Grayton, Student-victim
Civil Action No. 17-cv-2336-CAB-JMA
Plaintiff,
V.
State of California; Committee of Bar
Examiners, (the Committee)
Subcommittee of Examinations; Lisa
Cummins; Patrick Dixon; Floyd
Chapman; Chairpersons; DOES 1-50

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Defendants’ motion to dismiss based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is Granted. The complaint is
Dismissed without leave to amend in this Court, but without prejudice to re-filing in state court. It is So
Ordered.

Date:

2/27/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy