Gonzalez et al v. CoreCivic, Inc.
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 47 Motion to Withdraw.Attorney Vanessa Tamara Shakib terminated. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/20/2018. (mpl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
CARLOS GONZALEZ, JUAN JOSE
MERINO-RODAS, MARIBEL
GUTIERREZ-DUARTE, and JENNYE
PAGOADA-LOPEZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
17
18
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW
(ECF No. 47)
Plaintiffs,
15
16
Case No.: 17-CV-2573 JLS (NLS)
v.
CORECIVIC, INC.,
Defendant.
19
20
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw Vanessa Shakib as
21
Counsel. (“MTN,” ECF No. 47.) After considering Plaintiffs’ arguments and the law, the
22
Court GRANTS the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel.
23
“An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court, and the decision
24
to grant or deny counsel’s motion to withdraw is committed to the discretion of the trial
25
court.” Beard v. Shuttermart of Cal., Inc., No. 07CV594WQH (NLS), 2008 WL 410694,
26
at *2 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2008) (alterations, citations, and internal quotation marks
27
omitted); see also Civ. L.R. 83.3(g)(3). “In ruling on a motion to withdraw as counsel,
28
courts consider: (1) the reasons why withdrawal is sought; (2) the prejudice withdrawal
1
17-CV-2573 JLS (NLS)
1
may cause to other litigants; (3) the harm withdrawal might cause to the administration of
2
justice; and (4) the degree to which withdrawal will delay the resolution of the case.” Leatt
3
Corp. v. Innovative Safety Tech., LLC, No. 09-CV-1301-IEG (POR), 2010 WL 444708, at
4
*1 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010) (citing Beard, 2008 WL 410694, at *2).
5
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.4(b), each attorney “permitted to practice in this
6
court shall be familiar with and comply with the standards of professional conduct required
7
of members of the State Bar of California.” Civ. L.R. 83.4(b). In relevant part, California
8
Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700 provides:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
(A) In General.
(1) If permission for termination of employment is required by
the rules of a tribunal, a member shall not withdraw from
employment in a proceeding before that tribunal without its
permission.
(2) A member shall not withdraw from employment until the
member has taken reasonable steps to avoid reasonably
foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving
due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other
counsel, complying with rule 3-700(D) [concerning the return of
client papers and property and the refund of any advance fees not
earned], and complying with applicable laws and rules.
(C) Permissive Withdrawal.
[A] member may not request permission to withdraw in matters
pending before a tribunal, and may not withdraw in other matters,
unless such request or such withdrawal is because:
...
(5) The client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the
employment; or
(6) The member believes in good faith, in a proceeding pending
before a tribunal, that the tribunal will find the existence of
other good cause for withdrawal.
25
Pursuant to the Southern District of California’s Civil Local Rules, “[a] notice of motion
26
to withdraw as attorney of record must be served on the adverse party and on the moving
27
attorney’s client.” Civ. L.R. 83.3(f)(3)(a).
28
Plaintiffs state that Ms. Shakib has left the law firm representing Plaintiffs and they
2
17-CV-2573 JLS (NLS)
1
will continue to be represented by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC. (MTN 2.) The Court finds that
2
withdrawal will not prejudice the parties, Plaintiffs retain counsel, and withdrawal will not
3
delay the case. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw
4
as Counsel, (ECF No. 47). The Clerk of Court SHALL update the docket to reflect the
5
withdrawal of Ms. Shakib as counsel for Plaintiffs in this case.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 20, 2018
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
17-CV-2573 JLS (NLS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?