Williams v. Paramo et al

Filing 4

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. It is so ordered and adjudged that the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); dismisses this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the full s tatutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C.§ 1914(a); certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); and directs the Clerk of Court to close the file.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Lance Williams
Civil Action No. 17cv2596-MMA(BLM)
Plaintiff,
V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Daniel J. Paramo, Warden; J. Pulido,
Correction Officer; Rucker, Correction
Officer
Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (Doc. No. 2) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);
dismisses this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the full statutory and
administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C.§ 1914(a); certifies that an IFP appeal from
this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3); and directs the Clerk of Court to close the file.

Date:

3/1/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ R. Chapman
R. Chapman, Deputy