Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation et al

Filing 131

ORDER Re: Redacted Version of January 2, 2020 Order. To assist the Court in determining the appropriate extent of the redactions, and in light of the Court's sealing order (Doc. No. 116 ), the Court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint propose d redacted version of the Order directly to Chambers no later than January 10, 2020. The Court will review the proposed submission and issue a redacted version of the January 2, 2020 Order in due course. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/3/2020. (tcf)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Case No.: 18cv73-MMA (AGS)

AIRHAWK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a
California limited liability company,

12

ORDER RE: REDACTED VERSION
OF JANUARY 2, 2020 ORDER

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a
New Jersey corporation,

15
16

Defendant.

17
18

On January 2, 2020, the Court issued an Order ruling on Defendant Ontel Products

19

Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Daubert motions and motion for summary judgment. See

20

SEALED Doc. No. 130. The Court directed the Clerk of Court to file the Order under

21

seal.1 “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong

22

presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of

23

Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto.

24

Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The Court finds that compelling reasons

25

do not justify maintaining the entirety of the Order under seal. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v.

26

Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, the Court will issue a

27
28

1

Case participants in this action may access the Order electronically.
-1-

18cv73-MMA (AGS)

1
2

redacted version of the Order.
To assist the Court in determining the appropriate extent of the redactions, and in

3

light of the Court’s sealing order (Doc. No. 116), the Court ORDERS the parties to

4

submit a joint proposed redacted version of the Order directly to the undersigned’s

5

Chambers e-file address, [e-mail], no later than

6

January 10, 2020. The Court will review the proposed submission and issue a redacted

7

version of the January 2, 2020 Order in due course.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13
14

Dated: January 3, 2020
_____________________________
HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

18cv73-MMA (AGS)