Alkhamaisi et al v. Katmai Health Servces, LLC et al
Filing
26
ORDER Granting in Part 18 Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and Pre-Trial Proceedings Deadlines and Setting Forth Amended Scheduling Order. Telephonic attorneys-only Status Conference reset for 1/9/2019 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 09/06/2018. (ajs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
Raof Alkhamaisi, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated
employees; and Salah Salea, individually
and on behalf of all other similarly
situated employees,
19
20
21
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY AND PRE-TRIAL
PROCEEDINGS DEADLINES AND
SETTING FORTH AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
Plaintiffs,
17
18
Case No.: 18-cv-00115-WQH-BGS
v.
Katmai Health Services, LLC; Katmai
Government Services, LLC; and Does 1
through 25,
[ECF No. 18]
Defendants.
22
23
On August 21, 2018 Plaintiffs Raof Alkhamaisi and Salah Salea and Defendants
24
Katmai Health Services, LLC and Katmai Government Services, LLC filed a Joint Motion
25
to Extend Discovery and Pre-trial Proceedings Deadlines. (ECF No. 18.) In the motion,
26
the parties request a 12 week extension of the current September 11, 2018 deadline to file
27
a motion for class certification, a 13 week extension of the telephonic status conference
28
currently scheduled for October 3, 2018, and a 12 week extension of the current October
1
18-cv-00115-WQH-BGS
1
11, 2018 fact discovery cutoff. (ECF No. 18 at 4-5.) This extension request stems from
2
the fact that “Plaintiffs are not able to comply with the Court’s September 11, 2018 class
3
certification deadline because the Parties need additional time to complete oral and written
4
discovery related to class certification.” (Id. at 3.) Following review of the motion, the
5
Court requested and the parties submitted a Supplemental Joint Statement detailing the
6
specific discovery relating to class certification that remains outstanding. (ECF No. 25.)
7
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) provides that “[a] schedule may be
8
modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Civil Local Rule 16.1(b)
9
requires all counsel and parties to “proceed with diligence to take all steps necessary to
10
bring an action to readiness for trial.” In determining whether there is “good cause” under
11
Rule 16(b), the Court “primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the
12
amendment” and the “moving party’s reasons for seeking modification.” Johnson v.
13
Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). Good cause exists if the
14
party can show that the schedule “cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the
15
party seeking the extension.” Id. Carelessness is not compatible with a finding of diligence
16
and offers no reason for a grant of relief. Id. If the moving party was not diligent, the
17
inquiry should end. Id.
18
The parties represent that they have been “actively and diligently engaged in written
19
discovery.” (ECF No. 18 at 3.) However, stipulations for extensions amongst the parties
20
do not establish good cause to extend discovery deadlines. (See id. [“following a few
21
extensions”].) Further, by not abiding by the Court’s Chambers Rules regarding discovery
22
disputes, the parties have delayed the case unnecessarily. (See id. [the parties did not
23
resolve discovery disputes stemming from requests served on April 26, 2018 until August
24
7, 2018 outside of the Court’s procedures for addressing discovery disputes].)
25
Additionally, one of the parties’ purported reasons for not yet completing document
26
production is that Defendants agreed to produce employment records only upon entry of a
27
protective order. (ECF No. 25 at 3.) However, the parties did not submit a proposed
28
protective order until July 24, 2018 (ECF No. 16), which failed to comply with Chambers’
2
18-cv-00115-WQH-BGS
1
Rules. Further, when that proposed protective order was denied, the parties did not
2
resubmit an amended proposed protective order for an additional three weeks. (See ECF
3
Nos. 17, 20.)
4
Despite the actions of the parties highlighted above, the parties represent in their
5
supplemental statement that outstanding oral and written discovery is expected to be
6
completed in October 2018. (See ECF No. 25 at 3-4.) Accordingly, based on the reasons
7
set forth above, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and
8
Pre-trial Proceedings Deadlines (ECF No. 18). At this time, good cause supports extending
9
the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for class certification until November 13, 2018.
10
This extension should provide the parties with sufficient time to complete outstanding class
11
related document production and depositions.
12
extensions are likely to be granted and that the parties are to abide by Judge Skomal’s
13
Chambers’ Rules governing discovery disputes going forward.
14
HEREBY ORDERED:
The Court cautions that no further
Accordingly, IT IS
15
16
1.
Plaintiffs’ motion(s) for class certification and for conditional certification of
17
collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act must be filed on or before
18
November 13, 2018. Counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date
19
from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. The period of time between the
20
date you request a motion date and the hearing date may vary from one district judge to
21
another. Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not
22
being heard.
23
2.
A telephonic Status Conference shall be conducted on January 9, 2019 at
24
10:00 a.m. with Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. The teleconference shall be with
25
attorneys only. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall coordinate and initiate the JOINT call to
26
chambers at (619) 557-2993 on January 9, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
27
28
3.
All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by January 11, 2019.
“Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil
3
18-cv-00115-WQH-BGS
1
Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period
2
of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date,
3
taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal
4
Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer
5
with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The
6
Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court
7
intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any
8
discovery issue, counsel shall follow the procedures outlined in the undersigned
9
magistrate judge’s chambers rules. A failure to comply in this regard will result in a
10
waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no stipulation
11
continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the court.
12
13
14
4.
The Court has considered Defendants’ request to phase or bifurcate
discovery. (ECF No. 11 at 3.) The request is denied. Discovery is not bifurcated.
5.
Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court
15
may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on
16
the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.
17
18
6.
The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned district judge
and magistrate judge.
19
7.
20
cause shown.
21
8.
22
23
24
The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good
Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter
this case hereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 6, 2018
25
26
27
28
4
18-cv-00115-WQH-BGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?