Martinez v. Unknown

Filing 2

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/31/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Copy of blank IFP and blank Petition mailed) jjg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE LEOPOLDO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 18cv0218-CAB (WVG) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 14 15 16 UNKNOWN, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a document wherein he 18 requests an extension of time to file a federal habeas corpus petition because he has been 19 delayed in exhausting state court remedies as to some of his claims and the statute of 20 limitations to file a federal petition will soon expire. (ECF No. 1.) 21 Petitioner has not filed a Petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action. Therefore, 22 unless Petitioner is a capital prisoner, he has not initiated habeas proceedings in this Court. 23 Calderon (Nicolaus) v. United States District Court, 98 F.3d 1102, 1107 n.3 (9th Cir. 1996) 24 (“Unlike non-capital prisoner who initiate habeas proceedings by filing a petition for a writ 25 of habeas corpus, capital prisoners commence federal habeas proceedings by filing a 26 request for appointment of counsel.”); McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849 (1994). 27 Petitioner does not contend that he is a capital prisoner, that is, a prisoner under 28 sentence of death. As such, if Petitioner wishes to proceed with a habeas action in this 1 18cv0218-CAB (WVG) 1 Court he must (as is the case with all non-capital prisoners) file a petition for writ of habeas 2 corpus, which will be given a separate civil case number. However, if Petitioner is a capital 3 prisoner, he may request the Court to re-open this action in order to permit him to file a 4 Petition under the civil case number assigned to this action. 5 The Court cautions Petitioner that a one-year period of limitation applies to a petition 6 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. 7 The limitation period begins to run on the latest of: 8 (A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review; 9 10 (B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented from filing by such State action; 11 12 13 14 (C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or 15 16 17 (D) the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence. 18 19 20 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(1)(A)-(D) (West 2006). 21 The statute of limitations does not run while a properly filed state habeas corpus 22 petition is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2); see Nino v. Galaza, 183 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th 23 Cir. 1999). But see Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8 (2000) (holding that “an application is 24 ‘properly filed’ when its delivery and acceptance [by the appropriate court officer for 25 placement into the record] are in compliance with the applicable laws and rules governing 26 filings.”) The filing of a federal habeas petition does not toll the statute of limitations. 27 Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 181-82 (2001). 28 /// 2 18cv0218-CAB (WVG) 1 CONCLUSION AND ORDER 2 This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Petitioner has not filed a 3 Petition and has therefore failed to initiate federal habeas proceedings in this action. If 4 Petitioner is a capital prisoner he may request to have this case reopened. If Petitioner is a 5 non-capital prisoner, he may file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which will be given 6 a separate civil case number. For Petitioner’s convenience, the Clerk of Court is directed 7 to send Petitioner a blank Southern District of California In Form Pauperis Application and 8 a blank Southern District of California 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition form along with a copy 9 of this Order. 10 11 The Clerk shall close the file. Dated: January 31, 2018 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 18cv0218-CAB (WVG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?