Martinez v. Unknown
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/31/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Copy of blank IFP and blank Petition mailed) jjg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE LEOPOLDO MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 18cv0218-CAB (WVG)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v.
14
15
16
UNKNOWN,
Respondent.
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a document wherein he
18
requests an extension of time to file a federal habeas corpus petition because he has been
19
delayed in exhausting state court remedies as to some of his claims and the statute of
20
limitations to file a federal petition will soon expire. (ECF No. 1.)
21
Petitioner has not filed a Petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action. Therefore,
22
unless Petitioner is a capital prisoner, he has not initiated habeas proceedings in this Court.
23
Calderon (Nicolaus) v. United States District Court, 98 F.3d 1102, 1107 n.3 (9th Cir. 1996)
24
(“Unlike non-capital prisoner who initiate habeas proceedings by filing a petition for a writ
25
of habeas corpus, capital prisoners commence federal habeas proceedings by filing a
26
request for appointment of counsel.”); McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849 (1994).
27
Petitioner does not contend that he is a capital prisoner, that is, a prisoner under
28
sentence of death. As such, if Petitioner wishes to proceed with a habeas action in this
1
18cv0218-CAB (WVG)
1
Court he must (as is the case with all non-capital prisoners) file a petition for writ of habeas
2
corpus, which will be given a separate civil case number. However, if Petitioner is a capital
3
prisoner, he may request the Court to re-open this action in order to permit him to file a
4
Petition under the civil case number assigned to this action.
5
The Court cautions Petitioner that a one-year period of limitation applies to a petition
6
for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court.
7
The limitation period begins to run on the latest of:
8
(A) the date on which the judgment became final by the
conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for
seeking such review;
9
10
(B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application
created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws
of the United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented
from filing by such State action;
11
12
13
14
(C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was
initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been
newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively
applicable to cases on collateral review; or
15
16
17
(D) the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or
claims presented could have been discovered through the
exercise of due diligence.
18
19
20
28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(1)(A)-(D) (West 2006).
21
The statute of limitations does not run while a properly filed state habeas corpus
22
petition is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2); see Nino v. Galaza, 183 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th
23
Cir. 1999). But see Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8 (2000) (holding that “an application is
24
‘properly filed’ when its delivery and acceptance [by the appropriate court officer for
25
placement into the record] are in compliance with the applicable laws and rules governing
26
filings.”) The filing of a federal habeas petition does not toll the statute of limitations.
27
Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 181-82 (2001).
28
///
2
18cv0218-CAB (WVG)
1
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
2
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Petitioner has not filed a
3
Petition and has therefore failed to initiate federal habeas proceedings in this action. If
4
Petitioner is a capital prisoner he may request to have this case reopened. If Petitioner is a
5
non-capital prisoner, he may file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which will be given
6
a separate civil case number. For Petitioner’s convenience, the Clerk of Court is directed
7
to send Petitioner a blank Southern District of California In Form Pauperis Application and
8
a blank Southern District of California 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition form along with a copy
9
of this Order.
10
11
The Clerk shall close the file.
Dated: January 31, 2018
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
18cv0218-CAB (WVG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?