Mercado et al v. National Relations Labor Board et al
Filing
12
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 5 ; Dismissing Without Prejudice the Amended Complaint 5 ; Denying Without Prejudice Motion to Appoint Counsel 3 ; and Denying as Moot Motion to Dismiss 6 .. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/24/18.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALICIA MERCADO, et al.,
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00324-GPC-KSC
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
[ECF No. 5];
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD, et al.,
15
16
Defendants.
(2) DISMISSING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE THE AMENDED
COMPLAINT;
17
18
(3) DENYING WITHOUT
PRJEUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL [ECF No. 3]; and
19
20
21
(4) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO DISMISS [ECF No. 6]
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiffs filed this case without paying the filing fee. (See ECF No. 1.) The same
day the case was filed, Plaintiff Mercado filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis
(ECF No. 2) and a motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 3). One of the many defendants
in this case has filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 6.)
All parties instituting any non-habeas “civil action, suit, or proceeding” in a federal
28
1
3:18-cv-00324-GPC-KSC
1
district court must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may
2
proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted
3
leave to proceed IFP under § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051
4
(9th Cir. 2007). The plaintiff must submit an affidavit demonstrating her inability to pay
5
the filing fee and including a complete statement of the plaintiff’s assets. 28 U.S.C.
6
§ 1915(a)(1). When a plaintiff moves to proceed IFP, the court first “grants or denies IFP
7
status based on the plaintiff’s financial resources alone and then independently
8
determines whether to dismiss the complaint” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
9
Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1226 n.5 (9th Cir. 1984).
10
In the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff Mercado indicates that she is
11
employed by the Oceanside Unified School District. (ECF No. 2 at 2.) She does not,
12
however, indicate her gross monthly pay from that employment. (Id.) Without knowing
13
Plaintiff Mercado’s income amount, the Court cannot assess whether she can afford to
14
pay the filing fee. The motion to proceed IFP is therefore DENIED WITHOUT
15
PREJUDICE. Because no filing fee has been paid, and because no other plaintiff has
16
filed a motion to proceed IFP, the operative amended complaint is DISMISSED
17
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion to appoint counsel is DISMISSED WITHOUT
18
PREJUDICE. The motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 24, 2018
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $50.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14
(eff. Dec. 1, 2016)). The additional $50 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to
proceed IFP. Id.
2
3:18-cv-00324-GPC-KSC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?