Harris v. City of Carlsbad et al
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Order Granting 16 Petition for Compromise of Disputed Claim of Minor. The Court RECOMMENDS that Judge Sabraw approve the proposed settlement, grant the petition for compromise of dispute claim of minor. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than June 22, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 6/15/2018.(aef)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00349-DMS-NLS
LEJUAN HARRIS, by and through his parent
and general guardian, Amber Wiley,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR
COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIM OF
MINOR
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF CARLSBAD; MICHAEL KIDD;
MATTHEW JENCEN; and MALCOLM
WARFIELD,
[ECF No. 16]
Defendants.
18
19
On February 14, 2018, minor Plaintiff LeJuan Harris, by and through his parent and
20
general guardian, Amber Wiley, filed a complaint arising out of an incident which occurred on
21
September 23, 2016. ECF No. 1. On April 19, 2018, the parties notified the court that they had
22
settled the case. ECF No. 13. On May 15, 2018, Amber Wiley was appointed as the Guardian
23
Ad Litem (“GAL”) for Plaintiff. ECF No. 15. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Petition for
24
Compromise of Disputed Claim of Minor (“Petition”). ECF No. 16. The Petition was supported
25
by a declaration executed by Plaintiff’s counsel. Id. On May 18, 2018, Defendants filed a Notice
26
of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Petition. ECF No. 17. On May 21, 2018, the Honorable Barbara
27
L. Major, United States Magistrate Judge, was assigned to handle the Minor’s Compromise. ECF
28
No. 19. On May 30, 2018, Judge Major issued an Order Requiring Supplemental Briefing in
1
3:18-cv-00349-DMS-NLS
1
Support of Petition for Compromise of Disputed Claim of Minor. ECF No. 20. On June 6, 2018,
2
Plaintiff submitted supplemental briefing. ECF No. 21. The Court has considered the Petition
3
and the supplemental briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court RECOMMENDS
4
that the Honorable Dana M. Sabraw APPROVE the proposed compromise and GRANT the
5
Petition.
6
Plaintiff’s counsel explains that the parties, including both the minor Plaintiff and his
7
mother, attended an Early Neutral Evaluation with Judge Nita L. Stormes during which the facts
8
and legal issues were discussed in detail. ECF No. 21-1, Supplemental Declaration of Brody
9
McBride (“Supp. McBride Decl.”), ¶ 4. At the conclusion of the conference Judge Stormes made
10
a mediator’s recommendation of $10,000, which the parties accepted. Id. The settlement
11
amount will be split with $4,000 (40%) directed to Plaintiff’s counsel for their work, $1,336.11
12
allocated to cover litigation costs incurred during the litigation, and the remaining $4,663.89
13
going to the minor Plaintiff. ECF No. 16. This net settlement amount will be placed in a client
14
trust account held by Plaintiff’s counsel, Brody McBride of the Singleton Law Firm, until July 17,
15
2018 when the minor Plaintiff turns 18 years old. Id. On that date, Plaintiff will receive a check
16
in the amount of $4,663.89. Id.
17
Plaintiff’s counsel contends that considering the facts of the case, Plaintiff’s specific
18
claims, and recovery in similar cases, the net amount of $4,553.89 for Plaintiff is fair and
19
reasonable. See ECF No. 21 at 3-4; see also Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181–82
20
(9th Cir. 2011) (holding that district courts should limit the scope of their review of a compromise
21
or settlement of a minor’s claims “to the question whether the net amount distributed to each
22
minor plaintiff in the settlement is fair and reasonable, in light of the facts of the case, the
23
minor's specific claim, and recovery in similar cases”). Plaintiff’s counsel declares that the
24
settlement amount is fair and reasonable given Plaintiff’s minimal physical damages, the
25
potential legal issues, including qualified immunity, and damages awarded in similar cases. ECF
26
No. 21-1 at ¶¶ 6-12. Plaintiff’s counsel provides specific facts and case law to support his
27
opinion. Id. Finally, Plaintiff’s counsel justifies his attorneys’ fee request by explaining that he
28
“spent in excess of 50 hours on this case, which, at undersigned counsel’s hourly rate of $425,
2
3:18-cv-00349-DMS-NLS
1
totals more than $20,000.” Id. ¶ 13.
2
After conducting an independent inquiry and evaluation of the proposed settlement, the
3
Court finds that the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the
4
Plaintiff, given Plaintiff’s injuries, the legal and factual issues involved in this case, and recoveries
5
in similar cases. See Robidoux, 638 F.3d at 1181-82. The Court also finds that the proposed
6
expenses and attorneys’ fees are fair and reasonable. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS
7
that Judge Sabraw approve the proposed settlement, grant the petition for compromise of
8
dispute claim of minor, and issue the following orders:
9
1. Within two weeks after Judge Sabraw’s order, Defendants shall provide Plaintiff’s
10
counsel with a settlement check in the amount of $10,000 made payable to the
11
Singleton Law Firm, APC, 115 West Plaza Street, Solana Beach, CA 92075.
12
2. Upon receipt of the settlement check, Plaintiff’s counsel shall retain $4,000 to cover
13
attorneys’ fees and an additional $1,336.11 to cover the costs expended during
14
this litigation.
15
3. Plaintiff’s counsel shall place the remaining $4,663.89 in a client trust account for
16
minor Plaintiff when he reaches his eighteenth birthday. No withdrawals shall be
17
made from this account without a written order under this case name and number
18
and signed by a judge until the Plaintiff reaches his eighteenth birthday. When
19
Plaintiff attains the age of eighteen (on July 17, 2018), the Singleton Law Firm,
20
without further order of this Court, is authorized to pay $4,663.89 directly to
21
Plaintiff.
22
4. A joint motion for dismissal of the instant case shall be filed within five days after
23
receipt of the settlement check.
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any objections to this Report and Recommendation must
25
be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than June 22, 2018. The document
26
should be captioned “Objections to Report and Recommendation.”
27
///
28
///
3
3:18-cv-00349-DMS-NLS
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: 6/15/2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
3:18-cv-00349-DMS-NLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?