Gougher v. Smith et al

Filing 5

ORDER: The Motions to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2 ) is Denied. The Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 3 ) is Denied. This civil action is Dismissed without prejudice. To re-open his case, Plaintiff must, within forty-five days of this order, either: (1 ) prepay the full $400 filing fee or (2) file a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP together with the certified prison trust account statements required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect Plaintiff's current address. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 05/31/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 MARLIN LEE GOUGHER, BOP #71150-097, Case No.: 3:18-cv-00521-WQH-AGS 10 vs. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SMITH, Warden of MCC; C.O. OROSCO, Correctional Officer; C.O. Lt. KAAWALOA, Correctional Officer/SHU; C.O. SHAEBORN, Counselor/7th Floor; C.O. Counselor CLEVELAND; C.O. Unit Manager CASTILLO; All Members of SHU Team, Defendants. 19 20 ORDER Plaintiff, HAYES, Judge: On March 9, 2018, Plaintiff Marlin Gougher initiated this action by filing the 21 22 Complaint (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff was formerly a federal pretrial detainee at the 23 Metropolitan Correctional Center (“MCC”) in San Diego, California, but has been 24 convicted and transferred to the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Lompoc, 25 California.1 26 27 28 The Court takes judicial notice of Plaintiff’s criminal judgment, entered on December 18, 2017, in United States v. Gougher, S.D. Cal. Criminal Case No. 3:14-cr-00635-WQH-1 (ECF No. 185). See Bias v. Monyihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 2007) (federal courts “may take notice of proceedings in other 1 1 3:18-cv-00521-WQH-AGS 1 Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, 2 he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2), together with a Motion to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 § 1915(e)(1) (ECF No. 3). 5 I. Motion to Proceed IFP 6 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 7 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 8 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).2 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 9 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 10 § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the 11 plaintiff is a prisoner at the time of filing, he may be granted leave to proceed IFP, but he 12 nevertheless remains obligated to pay the entire fee in increments regardless of whether his 13 case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Williams v. Paramo, 775 14 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 15 A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who at the time of filing is “incarcerated or 16 detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated 17 delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole, probation, 18 pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 courts . . . if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue.” (quoting Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc., 285 F.3d 801, 803 n.2 (9th Cir. 2002)). According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) Inmate Locator, Plaintiff is now incarcerated at FCI-Lompoc. See Inmate Locator, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (last visited May 8, 2018); United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 n.2 (9th Cir. 2011) (taking judicial notice of information available to the public on the BOP’s Inmate Locator). Therefore, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to update the docket to reflect Plaintiff’s current address and to ensure he is notified of the proceedings in this case. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that it is his responsibility to “keep the court and opposing parties advised as to [his] current address.” See S.D. Cal. CivLR 83.11.b. 26 2 27 28 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. June. 1, 2016). The additional $50 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. 2 3:18-cv-00521-WQH-AGS 1 Prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also submit a “certified copy of the[ir] 2 trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period 3 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the 4 certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the 5 average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly 6 balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has 7 no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. The institution having 8 custody of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding 9 month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10, and forwards them to the 10 Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 11 Plaintiff has not attached a certified copy of his MCC and/or BOP trust account 12 statements for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 13 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. 14 statements, the Court is unable to assess the appropriate amount of the initial filing fee 15 which is statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. 16 § 1915(b)(1). 17 II. Without his certified trust account Motion to Appoint Counsel 18 Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) 19 (ECF No. 3). However, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) only applies in proceedings in forma 20 pauperis. Agyeman v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). Because 21 Plaintiff has not been granted leave to proceed IFP, he is not entitled to the appointment of 22 counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). 23 III. Conclusion and Order 24 The Motions to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. The Motion to Appoint 25 Counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED. This civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. To 26 re-open his case, Plaintiff must, within forty-five days of this order, either: (1) prepay the 27 full $400 filing fee or (2) file a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP together with the certified 28 prison trust account statements required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 3 3:18-cv-00521-WQH-AGS 1 The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect Plaintiff’s current address as: Marlin 2 Lee Gougher, BOP Reg. No. 71150-097, Federal Correctional Institution, 3600 Guard 3 Road, Lompoc, California, 93436. 4 Dated: May 31, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 3:18-cv-00521-WQH-AGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?