Hatcher v. Blake et al

Filing 11

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A (b), and his failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) in compliance with the Court's 5/17/2018 Order requiring amendment. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Robert Hatcher
Civil Action No. 18cv561-MMA(MDD)
Plaintiff,
V.
Dr. Blake, Medical Doctor; San Diego
Jail Medical Doctor; Medical Staff;
Nurses, San Diego County Mens Central
Jail, About 5 Nurses

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to state
a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and §
1915A(b), and his failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) in compliance
with the Court’s May 17, 2018 Order requiring amendment. The Court further certifies that an IFP
appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

Date:

7/17/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ R. Chapman
R. Chapman, Deputy