Hodge et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Neither party has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Burkhardt's R&R. Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds it thorough, well-reasoned, and contains no clear error. Accordingly, the Court hereby: (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Burkhardt's R&R in its entirety; and (2) DISMISSES the case WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/3/2018.(acc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH HODGE, et al., Case No.: 18-cv-00601-AJB-JLB Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 ORDER: v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 15 (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND Defendant. (2) DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE 16 17 18 (Doc. No. 21) 19 20 Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt’s Report and 21 Recommendation (“R&R”), which was issued on July 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 21.) On May 22 29, 2018, attorney Matin Rajabov, counsel for plaintiffs, failed to attend a court-ordered 23 Settlement Disposition Conference. (Doc. Nos. 10 and 11.) On May 29, 2018, an Order to 24 Show Cause was issued by Magistrate Judge Burkhardt ordering Matin Rajabov: (1) by 25 June 5, 2018, to file a declaration informing the Court why he did not attend the Settlement 26 Disposition Conference and why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to appear; 27 and (2) to attend a show cause hearing on June 14, 2018. (Doc. No. 13.) Matin Rajabov 28 failed to appear on June 14, 2018. On June 19, 2018, Magistrate Judge Burkhardt issued 1 18-cv-00601-AJB-JLB 1 an Order concluding that Matin Rajabov should be sanctioned for his failure to appear at 2 the court-ordered Settlement Disposition Conference and that the imposition of a $250.00 3 monetary sanction is both reasonable and just. (Doc. No. 18.) Further, the June 19, 2018 4 Order also directed Matin Rajabov to file a declaration informing the Court why an 5 additional monetary sanction in the amount of $500.00 should not be imposed for his 6 failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 18.) A show cause hearing was again held 7 on July 12, 2018 before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt and Matin Rajabov failed to appear. 8 (Doc. No. 20.) 9 The R&R recommends that this case be dismissed for Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiffs’ 10 counsel’s failure to comply with Court orders and meaningfully participate in this case 11 since the filing of the April 2018 Notice of Settlement. (Doc. No. 21 at 5.) The parties were 12 instructed to file written objections to the R&R by July 30, 2018, and a reply to the 13 objections no later than August 6, 2018. (Id.) 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district 15 judge’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s R&R. The district judge must “make 16 a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made[,]” 17 and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations 18 made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 19 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1989). However, in the absence of objection(s), the Court “need only 20 satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the 21 recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note to the 1983 amendment; 22 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 18-cv-00601-AJB-JLB 1 Neither party has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Burkhardt’s R&R. Having 2 reviewed the R&R, the Court finds it thorough, well-reasoned, and contains no clear error. 3 Accordingly, the Court hereby: (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Burkhardt’s R&R in its 4 entirety; and (2) DISMISSES the case WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is 5 directed to CLOSE this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: December 3, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 18-cv-00601-AJB-JLB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?