Goodlow, Jr. v. Camacho et al
Filing
3
ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Prepay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/23/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Copy of blank IFP form mailed to Plaintiff.)(jdt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
IVAN FRANCES GOODLOW, Jr.,
CDCR #AX-3970,
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00709-CAB-MDD
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILING TO PREPAY FILING
FEES REQUIRED BY
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
Mr. CAMACHO, C-Yard Correctional
Officer, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
[ECF No. 2]
18
19
IVAN FRANCES GOODLOW, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at
20
California State Prison in Lancaster (“LAC”), and proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint
21
pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on April 9, 2018. See Compl., ECF
22
No. 1.
23
Plaintiff claims several prison officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional
24
Facility, in San Diego, California, violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment
25
rights while he was incarcerated there in January and February 2018. Id. at 1-13. Plaintiff
26
did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time he
27
submitted his Complaint, but instead has filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
28
(“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2.
1
3:18-cv-00709-CAB-MDD
1
I.
2
Motion to Proceed IFP
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the
3
United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of
4
$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to
5
prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
6
§ 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the
7
plaintiff is a prisoner at the time of filing, he may be granted leave to proceed IFP, but he
8
nevertheless remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments,” see Williams v.
9
Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately
10
dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th
11
Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who at the time of filing is
12
“incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or
13
adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole,
14
probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h); Taylor, 281
15
F.3d at 847.
Prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also submit a “certified copy of the[ir]
16
17
trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period
18
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the
19
certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the
20
average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average
21
monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the
22
prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. After,
23
the institution having custody of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at
24
25
26
27
28
1
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative
fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court
Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. June. 1, 2016). The additional $50 administrative fee does
not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
2
3:18-cv-00709-CAB-MDD
1
20% of the preceding month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10,
2
and forwards them to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C.
3
§ 1915(b)(2).
4
While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a),
5
he has not attached a certified copy of his CDCR Inmate Statement Report for the 6-
6
month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C.
7
§ 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly requires that prisoners
8
“seeking to bring a civil action . . . without prepayment of fees . . . shall submit a certified
9
copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month
10
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2)
11
(emphasis added).
12
Without his CDCR-certified trust account statements, the Court is unable to assess
13
the appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the
14
prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
15
II.
Conclusion and Order
16
For this reason, IT IS ORDERED that:
17
(1)
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and the action is
18
DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28
19
U.S.C. § 1914(a).
20
(2)
Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in
21
which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and
22
administrative filing fee in one lump-sum, or (2) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP,
23
which includes a prison certificate and/or a certified copy of his CDCR Inmate Statement
24
Report for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
25
§ 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).
26
(3)
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court-
27
approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP” for his use
28
and convenience. But if Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full, nor sufficiently
3
3:18-cv-00709-CAB-MDD
1
completes and files a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of
2
his 6-month CDCR Inmate Statement Report within 45 days, this case will remained
3
dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and without any further
4
Order of the Court.1
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 23, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either prepaying the full
$400 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported renewed Motion to Proceed IFP,
his Complaint will be reviewed before service and may be dismissed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays or is
obligated to pay filing fees. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000)
(en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to
sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to
state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v.
Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by
28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a
governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”).
4
3:18-cv-00709-CAB-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?