Contreras v. Herrera

Filing 9

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b), and because he has failed to prosecute as required by Court's 10/4/2018 Order requiring amendment. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Miguel Contreras
Civil Action No. 18cv717-MMA(AGS)
Plaintiff,
V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

J. Herrera, Correctional Officer

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to state
a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and §
1915A(b), and because he has failed to prosecute as required by Court’s October 4, 2018 Order
requiring amendment. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good
faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and directs the Clerk to enter a final judgment of dismissal and
close the file.

Date:

12/13/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ R. Chapman
R. Chapman, Deputy