Talavera Hair Products, Inc. v. Taizhou Yunsung Electrical Appliance Co., LTD. et al
Filing
34
ORDER Granting in Part Plaintiff's 29 Ex Parte Motion. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/12/2018. (mpl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
TALAVERA HAIR PRODUCTS, INC.,
Case No.: 18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION
16
TAIZHOU YUNSUNG ELECTRICAL
APPLIANCE CO., LTD, et al,
(ECF No. 29)
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application Regarding Unknown
21
and Unserved Defendants Nos. 50–74, (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 29). Plaintiff requests
22
multiple orders from the Court: Orders (1) Permitting Plaintiff to serve third party
23
discovery on Amazon regarding the identify of Defendants Nos. 50–74; (2) Permitting
24
Plaintiff to file a notice to supplement the listings for Defendants Nos. 50–74 to add the
25
Seller ID Name; (3) Clarifying that Plaintiff may serve Defendants Nos. 50–74 pursuant to
26
the alternative service order; (4) Extending the TRO and Preliminary Injunction Dates.
27
///
28
///
1
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
1
I.
Discovery
2
Plaintiff seeks leave to serve a subpoena on Amazon to obtain Seller ID and email
3
information for Defendants Nos. 50–74. (Ex Parte App. 4.) Plaintiff seeks to serve twenty-
4
five subpoena requests, as follows:
5
Request No. 1:
For defendant 50 (listed on Exhibit 1 to the Complaint [Dkt. 1-3] and on Exhibit 1
to the TRO [Dkt. 10-1]), documents sufficient to show the following information
with respect to ASIN B0071HVQ9ZG associated with that defendant:
a. MERCHANT_LEGAL_NAME (for each seller of that ASIN);
b. MERCHANT_FRIENDLY_NAME (for each seller of that ASIN);
c. MERCHANT_EMAIL (for each seller of that ASIN).
6
7
8
9
10
11
(Id.) The requests will all be identical except for the Defendant number and associated
ASIN. (Id.)
12
This Court previously ordered that Amazon shall, “at Plaintiff’s request, provide
13
Plaintiff’s counsel with any e-mail address known to be associated with the Defendants’
14
respective Seller IDs.” (“TRO,” ECF No. 10, at 9.) Plaintiff states Amazon informed
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff there were no Seller IDs for these Defendants. (Ex Parte App. 6.) It appears that
Amazon is the only party with the information necessary to identify the Defendants.
A. Legal Standard
Discovery is not permitted before the parties have conferred pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(f) unless authorized by court order. Fed R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1).
“[H]owever, in rare cases, courts have made exceptions, permitting limited discovery to
ensue after filing of the complaint to permit the plaintiff to learn the identifying facts
necessary to permit service on the defendant.” Columbia Ins. Co. v. Seescandy.com, 185
F.R.D. 573, 577 (N.D. Cal. 1999). Requests to conduct discovery prior to a Rule 26(f)
conference are granted upon a showing of good cause by the moving party, which may be
25
found “where the need for expedited discovery, in consideration of the administration of
26
justice, outweighs the prejudice to the responding party.” Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron
27
Am., Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273, 275–76 (N.D. Cal. 2002). “A district court’s decision to grant
28
2
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
1
discovery to determine jurisdictional facts is a matter of discretion.” Columbia Ins. Co.,
2
185 F.R.D. at 578 (citing Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406,
3
430 n.24 (9th Cir. 1977)).
4
District courts in the Ninth Circuit apply a three-factor test for determining whether
5
good cause exists to allow for expedited discovery to identify Doe defendants. See
6
Columbia Ins., 185 F.R.D. at 578–80. “First, the plaintiff should identify the missing party
7
with sufficient specificity such that the Court can determine that defendant is a real person
8
or entity who could be sued in federal court.” Id. at 578. Second, the plaintiff “should
9
identify all previous steps taken to locate the elusive defendant” to ensure that the plaintiff
10
has made a good faith effort to identify and serve process on the defendant. Id. at 579.
11
Third, the plaintiff “should establish to the Court’s satisfaction that plaintiff’s suit against
12
defendant could withstand a motion to dismiss.” Id. (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d
13
627, 642 (9th Cir. 1980)). Further, the plaintiff “should file a request for discovery with
14
the Court, along with a statement of reasons justifying the specific discovery requested as
15
well as identification of a limited number of persons or entities on whom discovery process
16
might be served and for which there is a reasonable likelihood that the discovery process
17
will lead to identifying information about defendant that would make service of process
18
possible.” Id. at 580 (citing Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642).
19
B. Analysis
20
First, Plaintiff points to the fact that it has identified Defendants Nos. 50–74
21
previously in its Complaint. (Ex. Parte App. 6.) Plaintiff has previously alleged that all
22
Defendants in this matter are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district because they
23
direct their activities toward and conduct business with consumers with this state.
24
(“Compl.,” ECF No. 1, ¶ 6.) Plaintiff attests that Amazon “knows the Seller IDs and
25
associated email addresses for the ASINs used by Defendants 50–74 because Amazon
26
received infringement notices from Plaintiff regarding infringing products with the ASINs
27
associated with Defendants 50–74.” (Ex Parte App. 6.) The Court finds that Plaintiff has
28
3
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
1
met its burden of showing that Defendants Nos. 50–74 are entities that can be sued in this
2
court.
3
Second, Plaintiff states it sent notices to Amazon identifying ASINs associated with
4
Defendants Nos. 50–74 so Amazon could remove the infringing products, but Plaintiff
5
“cannot find documents identifying the Seller IDs of the sellers that sold the infringing
6
products associated with Defendants 50–74.” (Id.) Plaintiff states Amazon “took the
7
position that there were no Seller IDs listed for Defendants 50–74, so it had no obligation
8
to provide Seller IDs and email addresses for Defendants 50–74.” (Id.) Plaintiff states
9
“Amazon appears willing to provide the Seller IDs and email addresses for Defendants
10
50–74 if required to do so by subpoena or court order.” (Id.) The Court finds that Plaintiff
11
has made a good faith effort to identify and serve process on Defendants. Plaintiff cannot,
12
on its own, locate Defendant with any greater specificity than it already has.
13
Third, Plaintiff attests its suit could withstand a motion to dismiss. Indeed, this Court
14
has already determined “Plaintiff has proven it has a likelihood of success on its
15
infringement claims for its copyright, trademark, and patents.” (TRO 7.)
16
Plaintiff’s Application for discovery is GRANTED as follows:
17
1. Plaintiff may serve on Amazon subpoenas, pursuant to and compliant with the
18
procedures of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, seeking only the information
19
set forth in Plaintiff’s present application: a. MERCHANT_LEGAL_NAME (for
20
each seller of that ASIN); b. MERCHANT_FRIENDLY_NAME (for each seller
21
of that ASIN); and c. MERCHANT_EMAIL (for each seller of that ASIN);
22
2. Plaintiff’s subpoenas to Amazon must provide a minimum of thirty (30) calendar
23
days’ notice before any production responsive to the subpoena shall be made to
24
Plaintiff, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A);
25
26
3. At the time Plaintiff serves its subpoenas on Amazon, Plaintiff shall also serve
on Amazon a copy of this Order;
27
4. Within fourteen (14) calendar days after service of the subpoenas, Amazon shall
28
notify each Defendant Nos. 50–74 that his, her, or its identify has been
4
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
1
subpoenaed by Plaintiff and shall provide the Defendant with a copy of this
2
Order;
3
5. The Defendant shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the date of such notice
4
to challenge Amazon’s disclosure of his, her, or its name and address by filing an
5
appropriate pleading with this Court contesting the subpoena;
6
6. If Amazon seeks to modify or quash the subpoenas, it shall do so as provided by
7
8
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3);
II.
Supplemental Notice
9
Plaintiff requests the Court order it to file separate notices linked to the Complaint
10
and the Temporary Restraining Order that list the Defendants Nos. 50–74 and their
11
respective Seller IDs. (Ex Parte App. 7.) The Court GRANTS the request. If and when
12
Amazon supplies Plaintiff with the Seller IDs associated with Defendants Nos. 50–74,
13
Plaintiff SHALL file notices with the Court that list these Defendants and their respective
14
Seller IDs.
15
III.
Clarification Regarding Alternative Service
16
Plaintiff requests clarification that it is authorized to serve Defendants Nos. 50–74
17
pursuant to the Order Granting Motion Authorizing Alternative Service on Defendants.
18
(Ex Parte App 7.) The Court has previously authorized alternate service of process on
19
Defendants via email and website publication. (ECF No. 19.) This order applies to all
20
Defendants provided that Plaintiff’s attestations in its Motion for Alternative Service, (ECF
21
No. 18), apply to Defendants Nos. 50–74 as well.
22
IV.
TRO and Preliminary Injunction Dates
23
Plaintiff requests the Court extend the TRO and continue the hearing and briefing
24
schedule set for Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court EXTENDS the
25
TRO until further order of the Court. However, the Court finds it would be premature to
26
set a hearing date for the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, given the time parameters for
27
Plaintiff’s discovery request set forth above. The Court VACATES the hearing for
28
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction currently set for June 14, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
5
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
1
Plaintiff SHALL inform the Court when and if it is able to serve Defendants Nos. 50–74.
2
At that time, the Court will set a briefing and hearing schedule that allows these Defendants
3
a fair opportunity to oppose the Motion.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
18-CV-823-JLS (JLB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?