Pekrins et al v. Angulo et al

Filing 22

ORDER (1) Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation and (2) Granting 17 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's Report, and Plaintiff's objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge&# 039;s recommendation in full. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without further leave to amend. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/17/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARY RONNELL PERKINS,

Case No.: 18cv850 DMS (LL)
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

C. ANGULO; T. RAYBON; J. BERNAL,

15

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2)
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.

16
17

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s

18

First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. Defendants did not

19

file a reply. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.3, the motion

20

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation

21

(“Report”).

22

recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion. Plaintiff filed an objection to the

23

Report. Defendants did not file a reply.

On June 27, 2019, Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez issued her Report,

This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge’s Report, and Plaintiff’s

24
25

objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full. Accordingly,

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
18cv850 DMS (LL)

1

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is

2

dismissed with prejudice and without further leave to amend.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 17, 2019

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
18cv850 DMS (LL)