Taylor v. Paramo et al

Filing 8

ORDER Denying as Moot 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. The Court denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The Court advises Plaintiff that an amended complaint must be complete by itself without re ference to the original pleading. Any defendants not named, and any claim not re-alleged, in an amended complaint will be considered waived. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a court approved civil rights form complaint to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank 1983 FAC mailed)(rmc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 18cv942-MMA (BLM) ROBERT TAYLOR, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT PARAMO, et al., Defendants. 15 [Doc. No. 7] 16 17 Plaintiff Robert Taylor, a California inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil 18 rights action against various prison officials at R. J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San 19 Diego, California, alleging violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from the 20 excessive use of force. See Doc. No. 1. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A, and found it suitable for service upon 22 the named defendants. See Doc. No. 4. Plaintiff now moves for leave to amend his 23 complaint. See Doc. No. 7. 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides that “a party may amend its 25 pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 15(a)(1). To date, the record reflects that none of the named defendants to this action 27 have been served. Therefore, in this instance, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint 28 without leave of court. 1 18cv942-MMA (BLM) 1 Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an 2 amended complaint. The Court advises Plaintiff that an amended complaint must be 3 complete by itself without reference to the original pleading. Any defendants not named, 4 and any claim not re-alleged, in an amended complaint will be considered waived. See 5 S.D. Cal. CivLR 15.1; Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 6 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (“[A]n amended pleading supersedes the original.”); Lacey v. 7 Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (noting that claims dismissed with 8 leave to amend which are not re-alleged in an amended pleading may be “considered 9 waived if not repled.”). The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to mail a court- 10 11 12 13 approved civil rights form complaint to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: August 2, 2018 _______________________________________ HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 18cv942-MMA (BLM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?