PEOPLES v. PREMIER VAN LINES
Filing
7
Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. To date, Plaintiff has not paid the $400 filing fee or submitted supplemental proof of an inability to pay the filing fee. It is hereby ordered that the above-entitled case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 11/20/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER RAY PEOPLES,
Case No.: 18cv0969-JAH (RBB)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PREMIER VAN LINES,
15
Defendant.
16
17
On March 27, 2018, Plaintiff Christopher Ray Peoples, proceeding pro se, filed a
18
complaint against Defendant Premier Van Lines. Doc. No. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff
19
filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. No. 2. The Court denied Plaintiff’s
20
motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and instructed Plaintiff:
21
22
23
24
[I]n order to avoid dismissal of his case, he must either pay the $400
filing fee or submit supplemental proof of his inability to pay the filing
fee no later than September 10, 2018. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing
fee or submit adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee by September
10, 2018, his case will be dismissed without prejudice and he will have
to begin again by filing a new complaint.
25
26
27
28
Doc. No. 6 at 2. (emphasis in original).
To date, Plaintiff has not paid the $400 filing fee or submitted supplemental proof
of an inability to pay the filing fee.
1
18cv0969-JAH (RBB)
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled case is DISMISSED without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATED: November 20, 2019
_________________________________
JOHN A. HOUSTON
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
18cv0969-JAH (RBB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?