Chatman v. Nissan Corporation
Filing
7
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court Denies Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed IFP and to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(1) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Dismisses this civil action without pr ejudice for failure to pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); and Directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the file. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Eric Chatman
Civil Action No. 18-cv-01103-CAB-PCL
Plaintiff,
V.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Nissan Corporation
Defendant.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court Denies Plaintiff’s Motions to Proceed IFP and to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(1) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Dismisses this civil action without prejudice for failure to
pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Certifies
that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); and Directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the file.
It Is So Ordered.
Date:
6/27/18
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?