Ninteman v. The Dutra Group
Filing
46
ORDER Granting 45 Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order and Fourth Amended Scheduling Order. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is reset for 11/9/2020 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 4/21/2020. (tcf)
Case 3:18-cv-01222-MMA-AGS Document 46 Filed 04/21/20 PageID.236 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Robert NINTEMAN,
Case No.: 18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
THE DUTRA GROUP, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO AMEND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 45)
AND FOURTH AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Good cause appearing, the Court grants the parties’ joint motion to amend the
Scheduling Order. The new dates are:
Event
Expert Witness Designations and
Disclosures
Rebuttal Expert Witness Designations
and Disclosures
Fact Discovery Completion
Expert Discovery Completion
MSC Statements
Mandatory Settlement Conference
Pretrial Motions
Deadline
August 24, 2020
September 21, 2020
October 26, 2020
October 26, 2020
November 2, 2020
November 9, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.
November 30, 2020
25
26
This order only modifies the dates in the fourth amended scheduling order (ECF
27
No. 44); all other provisions of the Court’s original scheduling order (ECF No. 12) remain
28
in effect. The Court notes that this is the fourth extension requested, at least in part, in
18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS
Case 3:18-cv-01222-MMA-AGS Document 46 Filed 04/21/20 PageID.237 Page 2 of 2
1
anticipation of plaintiff reaching maximum medical improvement, (see ECF No. 36, at 2;
2
ECF No. 41, at 2; ECF No. 43, at 2; ECF No. 45, at 2) and reminds the parties that no
3
further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances.
4
Dated: April 21, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?