Ninteman v. The Dutra Group

Filing 46

ORDER Granting 45 Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order and Fourth Amended Scheduling Order. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is reset for 11/9/2020 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 4/21/2020. (tcf)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-01222-MMA-AGS Document 46 Filed 04/21/20 PageID.236 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Robert NINTEMAN, Case No.: 18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 THE DUTRA GROUP, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 45) AND FOURTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing, the Court grants the parties’ joint motion to amend the Scheduling Order. The new dates are: Event Expert Witness Designations and Disclosures Rebuttal Expert Witness Designations and Disclosures Fact Discovery Completion Expert Discovery Completion MSC Statements Mandatory Settlement Conference Pretrial Motions Deadline August 24, 2020 September 21, 2020 October 26, 2020 October 26, 2020 November 2, 2020 November 9, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. November 30, 2020 25 26 This order only modifies the dates in the fourth amended scheduling order (ECF 27 No. 44); all other provisions of the Court’s original scheduling order (ECF No. 12) remain 28 in effect. The Court notes that this is the fourth extension requested, at least in part, in 18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS Case 3:18-cv-01222-MMA-AGS Document 46 Filed 04/21/20 PageID.237 Page 2 of 2 1 anticipation of plaintiff reaching maximum medical improvement, (see ECF No. 36, at 2; 2 ECF No. 41, at 2; ECF No. 43, at 2; ECF No. 45, at 2) and reminds the parties that no 3 further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. 4 Dated: April 21, 2020 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18-cv-1222-MMA-AGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?