Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v. NecksGen Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER re 61 For Entry of Stipulated Consent Judgment and Order of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/8/2020. (mme)(jrd)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 SIMPSON PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., a Texas corporation, 13 ORDER FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No.: 3:18-cv-01260-BEN-MDD v. NECKSGEN INC., a California corporation, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Simpson Performance Products, Inc. and Defendant NecksGen Inc., 17 collectively the “Settling Parties,” have agreed to a negotiated settlement of the dispute 18 between them alleged in this action and have set forth the terms and conditions of such 19 settlement in a Confidential Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”). The 20 Settling Parties, by their respective undersigned attorneys, stipulate and consent to entry of 21 Judgment as set forth in their joint motion requesting same. 22 23 The Court has reviewed the joint motion and, good cause appearing, the joint motion is GRANTED. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 25 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this patent infringement 26 action, has personal jurisdiction over the Settling Parties, and expressly retains jurisdiction 27 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 28 2. This Action, including Plaintiff’s claims and Defendant’s counterclaims, is 1 3:18-cv-01260-BEN-MDD 1 hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Each of the Settling Parties bears its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 2 3. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Date: October 8, 2020 __________________________________ HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:18-cv-01260-BEN-MDD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?