Gallegos v. Seeley
Filing
3
ORDER (1) granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a) and (2) Directing US Marshal to effect service of summons and complaint pursuant to 28 USC 1915(d) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). The Court assesses no initial partial filing fee per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). However, the entire $350 balance of the filing fees mandated will be collected by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and forwarded to the Clerk of the Co urt pursuant to the installment payment provisions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). (Summons and IFP package prepared). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 7/11/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
Case No.: 3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
ALEJANDRO GALLEGOS
T-63165,
13
14
15
16
ORDER:
Plaintiff,
1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a) (ECF No. 2)
v.
K. SEELEY, M.D.,
Defendant.
17
AND
18
2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO
EFFECT SERVICE OF SUMMONS
AND COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed.R.Civ.P.
4(c)(3)
19
20
21
22
23
Alejandro Gallegos (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at California Institution for
24
Men located in Chino, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint
25
(“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil
26
filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a to Proceed In Forma
27
Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2).
1
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
1
I.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP
2
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the
3
United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of
4
$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). 1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to
5
prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
6
§ 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v.
7
Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if a prisoner, like Plaintiff, is granted
8
leave to proceed IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments,” see
9
Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his action
10
is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2).
11
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”),
12
a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a “certified copy of the trust fund
13
account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-month period
14
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v.
15
King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the
16
Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account
17
for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six
18
months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1);
19
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the prisoner then collects
20
subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any month in
21
which the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, and forwards those payments to the Court until
22
the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
In support of his IFP Motion, Plaintiff has submitted a certified copy of his trust
23
24
25
26
27
1
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May 1, 2013, must pay
an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees,
District Court Misc. Fee Schedule) (eff. May 1, 2013). However, the additional $50 administrative fee
is waived if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
2
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
1
account statement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Andrews,
2
398 F.3d at 1119. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s trust account statement, but it shows
3
that he has a current available balance of zero. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) (providing that
4
“[i]n no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action or appealing a civil
5
action or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets and no means by
6
which to pay the initial partial filing fee.”); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 850 (9th
7
Cir. 2002) (finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) acts as a “safety-valve” preventing
8
dismissal of a prisoner’s IFP case based solely on a “failure to pay . . . due to the lack of
9
funds available to him when payment is ordered.”).
10
Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) and
11
assesses no initial partial filing fee per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). However, the entire $350
12
balance of the filing fees mandated will be collected by the California Department of
13
Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court pursuant
14
to the installment payment provisions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
15
II.
Initial Screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A
16
Notwithstanding Plaintiff’s IFP status or the payment of any partial filing fees, the
17
PLRA also obligates the Court to review complaints filed by all persons proceeding IFP
18
and by those, like Plaintiff, who are “incarcerated or detained in any facility [and] accused
19
of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or
20
conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program,” “as soon as
21
practicable after docketing.” See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Under these
22
statutes, the Court must sua sponte dismiss complaints, or any portions thereof, which are
23
frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim, or which seek damages from defendants who are
24
immune. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122,
25
1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (§ 1915(e)(2)); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004
26
(9th Cir. 2010) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)).
27
All complaints must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that
3
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
1
the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are not
2
required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
3
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing
4
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). “Determining whether a
5
complaint states a plausible claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the
6
reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. The “mere
7
possibility of misconduct” falls short of meeting this plausibility standard. Id.; see also
8
Moss v. U.S. Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 2009).
9
“When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their
10
veracity, and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.”
11
Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679; see also Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)
12
(“[W]hen determining whether a complaint states a claim, a court must accept as true all
13
allegations of material fact and must construe those facts in the light most favorable to
14
the plaintiff.”); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that §
15
1915(e)(2) “parallels the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)”).
16
However, while the court “ha[s] an obligation where the petitioner is pro se,
17
particularly in civil rights cases, to construe the pleadings liberally and to afford the
18
petitioner the benefit of any doubt,” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir.
19
2010) (citing Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1027 n.1 (9th Cir. 1985)), it may not “supply
20
essential elements of claims that were not initially pled.” Ivey v. Board of Regents of the
21
University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).
22
As currently pleaded, the Court finds allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint which are
23
sufficient to survive the sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and
24
1915A(b). Accordingly, the Court will direct the U.S. Marshal to effect service on
25
Plaintiff’s behalf. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve
26
all process, and perform all duties in [IFP] cases.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (“[T]he court may
27
order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal . . . if the plaintiff
4
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
1
is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.”).
2
III.
Conclusion and Order
3
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
5
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No.
2) is GRANTED.
2.
6
The Secretary of the CDCR, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff’s
7
prison trust account the $350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments
8
from the account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s
9
income and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account
10
exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). ALL PAYMENTS SHALL BE
11
CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS
12
ACTION.
3.
13
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Scott
14
Kernan, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, P.O. Box
15
942883, Sacramento, California, 94283-0001.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
17
4.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue a summons as to Plaintiff’s Complaint
18
(ECF No. 1) upon Defendant and forward it to Plaintiff along with blank U.S. Marshal
19
Form 285s for each named Defendant. In addition, the Clerk is directed provide Plaintiff
20
with a certified copy of this Order and a certified copy of his Complaint (ECF No. 1) and
21
the summons so that he may serve each named Defendant. Upon receipt of this “IFP
22
Package,” Plaintiff is directed to complete the Form 285s as completely and accurately as
23
possible, and to return them to the United States Marshal according to the instructions
24
provided by the Clerk in the letter accompanying his IFP package.
25
///
26
///
27
///
5
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
1
5.
Upon receipt, the U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve a copy of the
2
Complaint and summons upon the named Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on the USM
3
Form 285s. All costs of service will be advanced by the United States. See 28 U.S.C.
4
§ 1915(d); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3).
5
6.
Plaintiff must serve upon the Defendant or, if appearance has been entered by
6
counsel, upon Defendant’s counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document
7
submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff must include with the original paper to
8
be filed with the Clerk of the Court, a certificate stating the manner in which a true and
9
correct copy of the document was served on the Defendant, or counsel for Defendant, and
10
the date of that service. Any paper received by the Court which has not been properly filed
11
with the Clerk, or which fails to include a Certificate of Service, may be disregarded.
12
13
Dated: July 11, 2018
Hon. John A. Houston
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
6
3:18-cv-01322-JAH-BGS
I:\Everyone\_EFILE-PROSE\JAH\18cv1322-grt & serve.docm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?