Gallegos v. Seeley

Filing 33

ORDER after Telephonic Status Conference. The Court held a Telephonic Status Conference on October 7, 2019 to discuss any issues regarding discovery and communication between Plaintiff and Defense Counsel. Plaintiff and Defense Counsel discussed Plai ntiff's discovery and communication concerns with the Court, and both Plaintiff and Defense Counsel agreed that there are no outstanding discovery issues between the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 10/8/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALEJANDRO GALLEGOS,

Case No.: 18cv1322-JAH (MSB)
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC STATUS
CONFERENCE

K. SEELEY, M.D.,
Defendant.

15
16
17

The Court held a Telephonic Status Conference on October 7, 2019 to discuss any

18

issues regarding discovery and communication between Plaintiff and Defense Counsel.

19

Plaintiff and Defense Counsel discussed Plaintiff’s discovery and communication

20

concerns with the Court, and both Plaintiff and Defense Counsel agreed that there are

21

no outstanding discovery issues between the parties.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 8, 2019

24
25
26
27
28
18cv1322-JAH (MSB)