Orozco v. Berryhill

Filing 25

ORDER: (1) Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation (2) Granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Denying 21 Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall enter the judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/21/2019.(aef)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GLORIA B. OROZCO,
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner
of Social Security,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Case No. 18-cv-1329 DMS (AGS)
ORDER:
(1) ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND
(3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S
CROSS MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18
19

On June 19, 2018, Plaintiff Gloria Orozco, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed

20

a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by

21

the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for disability benefits. On

22

October 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment, and on November

23

15, 2018, the Commissioner filed a cross motion for summary judgment. On August

24

6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler issued a Report and

25

Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion

26

for summary judgment, deny the Commissioner’s cross motion for summary

27

judgment, and that Judgment be entered reversing the decision of the Commissioner

28

and remanding the matter for further administrative proceedings.
–1–

18-cv-1329 DMS (AGS)

1

Neither party filed an objection to the R&R. This Court, having reviewed de

2

novo the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.

3

The Clerk of the Court shall enter the judgment accordingly.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 21, 2019

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–

18-cv-1329 DMS (AGS)