National Funding, Inc. v. Webb Foot & Ankle Clinic, PC et al

Filing 5

ORDER Denying 3 Motion to Dismiss As Moot. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/9/2018. (jao)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATIONAL FUNDING, INC., Case No.: 18-CV-1338 W (WVG) Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT [DOC. 3] WEBB FOOT & ANKLE CLINIC, PC, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 On June 25, 2018, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. [Doc. 3.] 11 days later, on July 6, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. 4.] 19 A party may amend a complaint within 21 days of service of a responsive pleading. 20 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). “It is well-established in our circuit that an ‘amended 21 complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent.’ ” 22 23 24 25 26 27 Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997)). Accordingly, when a plaintiff timely amends, the original complaint ceases to exist, and any pending motions to dismiss it are moot. See id. // // 28 1 18-CV-1338 W (WVG) 1 2 In light of the filing of the FAC, the Court denies Defendant’s motion [Doc. 3] as moot. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 18-CV-1338 W (WVG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?