Rosales v. Pandora's Pizza, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/16/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR ROSALES, Case No.: 18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM) Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE PANDORA’S PIZZA, INC., Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 On June 14, 2021, the Court issued an Order (“Order,” ECF No. 19) ordering 20 Plaintiff Omar Rosales to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of 21 standing and for failure to comply with the Local Rules of Practice for persons appearing 22 without an attorney. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a written response within thirty 23 days and warned that “[f]ailure to respond timely will result in dismissal for lack of 24 standing.” Order at 7 (emphasis in original). Although more than thirty days have elapsed 25 since the electronic docketing of the Order, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Order. 26 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action in its entirety for 27 lack of standing, failure to comply with the Order, and for all the reasons set forth in the 28 /// 1 18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM) 1 Court’s June 14, 2021 Order (ECF No. 19). The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the 2 file. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2021 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?