Sekerke v. Leo et al
Filing
30
ORDER Denying 21 , 26 Motions to Join Defendants and Claims; and Granting 29 Plaintiff's Request for Copies. The Clerk ofCourt shall provide Plaintiff with copies of the Court's orders docketed at ECF Nos. 18,22, and 23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 10/11/19. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, including copies of documents listed in Order)(dlg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE,
Case No.: 19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
JOIN DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS
[ECF NOS. 21, 26];
ARTURO LEO; MARK O'BRIEN;
SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE,
15
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST FOR COPIES
[ECF NO. 29]
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff Keith Wayne Sekerke, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a Motion to
19
Join Defendants and Joinder of Claims, construed by the Court as a motion for leave to
20
file a second amended complaint [ECF No. 21]; a Joinder of Claims, which the Court
21
construes as a motion for joinder of claims [ECF No. 26]; and an Ex Parte Notice of
22
Retaliation and Request for Duplicate Orders [ECF No. 29]. For the reasons set forth
23
below, Plaintiff's motions for leave to file a second amended complaint and for joinder of
24
claims are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and his request for duplicate copies is
25
GRANTED.
26
I.
BACKGROUND
27
In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that he suffers from health
28
conditions requiring pain medications. (First Am. Compl. 4, ECF No. 7.) Sekerke
1
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
1
contends that the San Diego Central Jail, where he is currently incarcerated, has a blanket
2
policy of refusing to provide narcotics to inmates in violation of the Eighth and
3
Fourteenth Amendments, and that Defendants Arturo Leon, M.D. (erroneously sued as
4
Arturo Leo), Mark O'Brien, M.D., and Sheriff William Gore violated his right to
5
adequate medical care by complying with this policy. (Id. at 3, 4.) Plaintiff further
6
alleges that he was denied the right to adequate medical care when he developed a
7
MRSA1 infection the day after arriving at the jail. (Id. at 15.) He claims that the San
8
Diego County Sheriff's Department's policy of refusing to provide bed sheets to cover
9
"well used mattresses" caused his infection. (Id.) He contends that Defendant Gore is
10
responsible for this policy and that Defendant Leon refused to provide any treatment for
11
Plaintiff's condition. (Id.)
12
In his motion for leave to join defendants and file a second amended complaint,
13
Sekerke seeks to add four additional defendants to this action: Barbara Lee, Sheriff
14
Deputy D. Olsen, Sergeant A. Sevilla, and Lieutenant Laura Coyne. (Mot. Join Defs. 1,
15
ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff contends that Lee, as the Sheriff's Department's Medical
16
Administrator, is responsible for the blanket policy of denying narcotic pain medications
17
to all inmates, and she denied him medical treatment that had been prescribed by a jail
18
physician. (Id. at 2-3.) Additionally, Sekerke alleges that following the service of his
19
complaint upon the three defendants currently named in this case, jail employees Olsen,
20
Sevilla, and Coyne retaliated against Sekerke by placing him in administrative
21
segregation. (Id. at 3-5.) Defendant Gore filed an opposition to Plaintiff's motion in
22
accordance with a briefing schedule issued by the Court [ECF No. 24]. Plaintiff filed a
23
reply [ECF No. 27].
24
///
25
26
27
1
28
The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines "MRSA" to mean "methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus." Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/MRSA (last
visited Oct. 11, 2019).
2
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
1
In his motion for joinder of claims, Sekerke seeks to add a claim against Leon,
2
O'Brien, and Lee for denying him copies of his medical records. (Mot. [Joinder Claims]
3
1, ECF No. 26.) He also appears to allege that he has been denied medical treatment in
4
retaliation for filing this lawsuit. (Id. at 1-3.) The Court did not issue a briefing schedule
5
on this motion.
6
Plaintiff's Ex Parte Notice of Retaliation and Request for Duplicate Orders, filed on
7
October 9, 2019, is illegible in part but appears to allege that Sekerke was strip-searched
8
in retaliation for his lawsuits and complaints. (Notice Retaliation & Req. 2-4, ECF No.
9
29.) He also claims that documents are missing from his cell as a result of it being
10
searched and requests copies of "all the filings and court orders since July 2019." (Id. at
11
2, 6.)
12
II.
DISCUSSION
13 A.
Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint and Motion for
14
Joinder of Claims
15
Plaintiff cannot add new defendants or claims to this case by filing a Joinder of
16
Claims or an Ex Parte Notice of Retaliation. Adding parties requires amending the
17
pleadings. See 4 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 20.02[2][a][ii], at
18
20-13 (3d ed. 2019) ("Plaintiff may [bring in additional parties] only by amending the
19
complaint."). If Plaintiff wishes to add defendants or claims to this case, he must file a
20
motion for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules
21
of Civil Procedure. A motion to amend a pleading must be accompanied by a copy of the
22
proposed amended pleading. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 15.1.b.; see also Spadafore v.
23
Gardner, 330 F.3d 849, 853 (6th Cir. 2003). Here, Plaintiff has filed a document
24
construed by the Court as a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint but has
25
failed to provide a copy of his proposed amended complaint. Accordingly, his motion for
26
leave to file a second amended complaint and related motion for joinder of claims are
27
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff wishes to add defendants and claims to
28
///
3
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
1
this case, he must refile a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and must
2
attach a copy of the proposed second amended complaint to the motion.
3
Additionally, Plaintiff should note that prisoners are not permitted to raise all their
4
claims in a single action under Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure simply
5
because multiple incidents of allegedly wrongful conduct involve prison officials in the
6
same prison. See, e.g., Reed v. Hinshaw, No. 1:11-cv-00340-AWI-SAB (PC), 2013 WL
7
3198611, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 21, 2013). Rule 20 permits multiple parties to be joined
8
as defendants in a single action only if claims are asserted against them jointly or
9
severally, or arise "out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or
10
occurrences" and "any question of fact or law common to all defendants will arise in the
11
action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Unrelated claims that involve different defendants
12
must be brought in separate lawsuits. See Reed, 2013 WL 3198611, at *2 (citing George
13
v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)). Moreover, although Rule 15 permits a
14
party to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth "any transaction, occurrence, or event
15
that happened after the date of the pleading to be supplemented[,]" (see Fed. R. Civ. P.
16
15(d)), a supplemental pleading may not introduce a "separate, distinct and new cause of
17
action." Planned Parenthood of S. Arizona v. Neely, 130 F.3d 400, 402 (9th Cir. 1997)
18
(citation omitted). Supplemental pleadings are a particular concern in prisoner cases, in
19
which "joining unrelated claims could result in avoidance of a filing fee or circumvent
20
the [Prison Litigation Reform Act]'s three strikes rule." Singleton v. Kernan, Case No.:
21
3:16-cv-2462-BAS-NLS, 2017 WL 4021536, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 12, 2017) (citations
22
omitted).
23
B.
Request for Copies
24
Sekerke claims that documents are missing from his cell as a result of it being
25
searched and requests copies of "all the filings and court orders since July 2019." (Notice
26
Retaliation & Req. 2, 6, ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. The Clerk of
27
Court shall provide Plaintiff with copies of the Court's orders docketed at ECF Nos. 18,
28
22, and 23. The Court further DIRECTS Defendant Gore to provide Plaintiff with an
4
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
1
additional copy of his motion to dismiss [ECF No. 13] and Defendants Leon and O'Brien
2
to provide Plaintiff with an additional copy of their answer [ECF No. 16].
3
III.
4
CONCLUSION
For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff's motions for leave to file a second
5
amended complaint [ECF No. 21] and motion for joinder of claims [ECF No. 26] are
6
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff wishes to add defendants and claims to
7
this case, he must file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint by
8
November 12, 2019, and must attach a copy of the proposed second amended complaint
9
to the motion. Plaintiff is advised that the second amended complaint must be clearly
10
captioned as such, shall be complete in itself without reference to the prior pleadings, and
11
shall contain copies of all exhibits referred to in the second amended complaint. See S.D.
12
Cal. Civ. R. 15.1.a. Defendants not named and any claim not realleged in the second
13
amended complaint will be considered waived. See, e.g., Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v.
14
Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) ("[A]n amended
15
pleading supersedes the original."). If Plaintiff fails to file a motion for leave to file a
16
second amended complaint within the time allotted, or if the proposed second amended
17
complaint fails to comply with these general rules of pleading, the First Amended
18
Complaint, already on file with the Court, will remain as the operative pleading in this
19
matter.
20
Plaintiff's request for copies [ECF No. 29] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court
21
shall provide Plaintiff with copies of the Court's orders docketed at ECF Nos. 18, 22, and
22
23. Defendant Gore shall provide Plaintiff with an additional copy of his motion to
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
5
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
1
dismiss [ECF No. 13] and Defendants Leon and O'Brien shall provide Plaintiff with an
2
additional copy of their answer [ECF No. 16].
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: October 11, 2019
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
19cv0034-GPC(RBB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?