Morgan et al v. Hall et al

Filing 34

ORDER Granting 31 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 9/15/2020. (tcf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 TRAVIS MORGAN and MALINA GOMEZ, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Case No.: 19cv1348-JAH (KSC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION [Doc. No. 31] Plaintiffs, v. SANDRA HALL, an individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Cuyamaca Mountain Trust dated 04-2602; and WKS FROSTY Corporation, a California Corporation and Does 1-10, Defendants. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants Sandra Hall and WKS Frosty Corporation 20 (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Travis Morgan and Malina 21 Gomez’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 22 Doc. No. 31. Plaintiffs filed a non-opposition response to Defendants’ motion. See Doc. 23 Nos. 33. Having carefully considered the pleadings, the Court hereby GRANTS 24 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for 2 lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is 3 DISMISSED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: September 15, 2020 ______________________________ Hon. John A. Houston United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?