Bryan v. MTGLQ Investors L.P.

Filing 2

ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/14/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No.: 19-mc-26-BTM Catherine Clare Bryan, 11 Appellant, Appellee. 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS RE BANKRUPTCY APPEAL SC-18-1173 [ECF NO. 1] v. 13 MTGLQ Investors L.P., 14 15 16 17 18 Before the Court is the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the 19 Ninth Circuit transferring to this Court the pending motion for leave to proceed in 20 forma pauperis filed by Appellant Catherine Clare Bryan re bankruptcy appeal SC- 21 18-1173. (ECF No. 1 at 1-2.) 22 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma 23 pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 24 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Lack of good faith “has been held to be equivalent to a 25 finding of frivolity.” Knapp v. Hogan, 738 F.3d 1106, 1110 (9th Cir. 2013). On November 26, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court certified that the appeal 26 27 is frivolous. (See ECF No. 1 at 7-10.) 28 // 1 19-mc-26-BTM 1 2 3 4 This Court agrees, and accordingly, DENIES Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2019 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 19-mc-26-BTM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?