McGraw v. Pacifica Ashwood LLC et al

Filing 58

ORDER Vacating Scheduling Order Deadlines and Denying as Moot Joint Motion for Continuance [Doc. No. #55 ]. The Court will issue a revised Scheduling Order when Yardi's responsive pleading, if any, is on file. The remaining dates in the August 19, 2020 Scheduling Order [Doc. No. #29 ] are hereby VACATED. The parties' Joint Motion for Continuance of Scheduling Order Deadlines [Doc. No. #55 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 1/6/2021. (tcf)

Download PDF
Case 3:20-cv-00954-MMA-KSC Document 58 Filed 01/06/21 PageID.346 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDALL SCOTT McGRAW, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00954-MMA-KSC Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES AND DENYING AS MOOT JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE PACIFICA ASHWOOD LLC, et al, 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 55] 16 17 Before the Court is plaintiff’s and Pacifica Ashwood LLC’s second request to 18 continue the dates in the Court’s August 19, 2020 Scheduling Order. Doc. No. 55. On 19 December 10, 2020, plaintiff amended his complaint to add Yardi Systems, Inc. (“Yardi”) 20 as a defendant. Doc. No. 49. Yardi’s response to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC’) 21 is due January 25, 2021. Doc. No. 57. In the meantime, the fact discovery cutoff as set in 22 the current Scheduling Order will pass, and shortly thereafter the parties must designate 23 experts, exchange expert reports, and begin preparing dispositive motions. See Doc. No. 24 29. Although the addition of a new party provides good cause to extend the current pretrial 25 deadlines, the Court finds that the interests of judicial economy will be best served by 26 vacating the current pretrial schedule. The Court will issue a revised Scheduling Order 27 when Yardi’s responsive pleading, if any, is on file. 28 // 1 3:20-cv-00954-MMA-KSC Case 3:20-cv-00954-MMA-KSC Document 58 Filed 01/06/21 PageID.347 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, the remaining dates in the August 19, 2020 Scheduling Order [Doc. 2 No. 29] are hereby VACATED. The parties’ Joint Motion for Continuance of Scheduling 3 Order Deadlines [Doc. No. 55] is DENIED AS MOOT. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:20-cv-00954-MMA-KSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?