Brooke v. Wave Crest Resorts III LLC
Filing
7
ORDER Re: Dismissal [Doc. No. 6 ]. Pursuant to the stipulation and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action has been DISMISSED with prejudice and with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate this action in its entirety. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/9/2020. (tcf)
Case 3:20-cv-01218-MMA-AGS Document 7 Filed 09/09/20 PageID.36 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERESA BROOKE,
Case No. 20-cv-1218-MMA (AGS)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL
WAVE CREST RESORTS III LLC,
15
[Doc. No. 6]
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
The parties have filed a “Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice” agreeing to
20
dismissal of this action. See Doc. No. 6. Pursuant to the stipulation and Federal Rule of
21
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action has been DISMISSED with prejudice and
22
with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees. See Commercial Space Mgmt.
23
Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]nce a notice of voluntary
24
dismissal is filed, the district court in which the action is pending loses jurisdiction and
25
cannot exercise discretion with respect to the terms and conditions of the dismissal.”); see
26
also Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001)
27
(quoting Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 610 (9th Cir. 1993)) (“The [filing of a Rule
28
41(a)(1)(i) notice] itself closes the file.”); Acosta v. Lopez, No. 1:18-cv-00625-AWI1
20-cv-1218-MMA (AGS)
Case 3:20-cv-01218-MMA-AGS Document 7 Filed 09/09/20 PageID.37 Page 2 of 2
1
SKO, 2019 WL 5536321, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2019) (“Once the stipulation between
2
the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in open court, no order of the
3
court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case law concerning stipulated dismissals
4
under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is
5
effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.”); Milton v. Lawton, No.
6
1:04-cv-05556-AWI-WMW, 2009 WL 530909, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009) (same).
7
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate this action in its entirety.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: September 9, 2020
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
20-cv-1218-MMA (AGS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?