Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. et al v. Dotzenroth et al

Filing 184

ORDER denying 96 Motion for partial judgment on the Pleadings as moot. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/07/2022. (jpp)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-00994-L-AGS Document 184 Filed 01/07/22 PageID.8215 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WAGNER AERONAUTICAL, INC.; 12 MAMMOTH FREIGHTERS LLC; 13 WILLIAM WAGNER; and WILLIAM 14 TARPLEY, Case No.: 21cv0994-L-AGS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS MOOT 15 [ECF NO. 96] 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 DAVID DOTZENROTH; SEQUOIA 20 AIRCRAFT CONVERSIONS, LLC; CAI 21 CONSULTING LTD; CHARLES WILEY 22 DOTZENROTH; ANDREW MANSELL; 23 STEVEN WELO; and DOES 1 through 24 50 inclusive, 25 Defendants 26 27 28 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). [ECF No. 96.] Plaintiff 1 21cv0994-L-AGS Case 3:21-cv-00994-L-AGS Document 184 Filed 01/07/22 PageID.8216 Page 2 of 2 1 timely filed an amended complaint [ECF No. 132]. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B). 2 "Rule 12(c) is functionally identical to Rule 12(b)(6) and ... the same standard of review 3 applies to motions brought under either rule.” See United States ex rel. Cafasso v. Gen 4 Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1054 n.4 (9th Cir. 2011) (internal quotation 5 marks and citations omitted). Accordingly, the Motion for Partial Judgment on the 6 Pleadings is denied as moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 7 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: January 7, 2022 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 21cv0994-L-AGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?