Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. et al v. Dotzenroth et al
Filing
184
ORDER denying 96 Motion for partial judgment on the Pleadings as moot. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/07/2022. (jpp)
Case 3:21-cv-00994-L-AGS Document 184 Filed 01/07/22 PageID.8215 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAGNER AERONAUTICAL, INC.;
12
MAMMOTH FREIGHTERS LLC;
13
WILLIAM WAGNER; and WILLIAM
14
TARPLEY,
Case No.: 21cv0994-L-AGS
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS AS MOOT
15
[ECF NO. 96]
16
Plaintiffs,
17
vs.
18
19
DAVID DOTZENROTH; SEQUOIA
20
AIRCRAFT CONVERSIONS, LLC; CAI
21
CONSULTING LTD; CHARLES WILEY
22
DOTZENROTH; ANDREW MANSELL;
23
STEVEN WELO; and DOES 1 through
24
50 inclusive,
25
Defendants
26
27
28
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the
Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). [ECF No. 96.] Plaintiff
1
21cv0994-L-AGS
Case 3:21-cv-00994-L-AGS Document 184 Filed 01/07/22 PageID.8216 Page 2 of 2
1
timely filed an amended complaint [ECF No. 132]. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B).
2
"Rule 12(c) is functionally identical to Rule 12(b)(6) and ... the same standard of review
3
applies to motions brought under either rule.” See United States ex rel. Cafasso v. Gen
4
Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1054 n.4 (9th Cir. 2011) (internal quotation
5
marks and citations omitted). Accordingly, the Motion for Partial Judgment on the
6
Pleadings is denied as moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002,
7
1008 (9th Cir. 2015).
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: January 7, 2022
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
21cv0994-L-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?