Llamas-Rendon v. GEO Secure Services, LLC et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 39 ). Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 1/6/25. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VANESSA LLAMAS-RENDON, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, et al., Case No.: 3:23-cv-01528-RBM-LR ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. 39] Defendants. 15 16 17 On December 31, 2024, Plaintiff Vanessa Llamas-Rendon and Defendant GEO 18 Secure Services, LLC (collectively, the “Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss (“Joint 19 Motion”). (Doc. 39.) In their Joint Motion, the Parties stipulated “to the dismissal of 20 Plaintiff’s Complaint and the entire action, including all causes of action and claims for 21 damages, asserted against all Defendants, with prejudice” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 41(a)(2).1 (Id. at 2.) The Parties also stipulated that each party shall “bear its 23 own attorneys’ fees and costs.” (Id.) 24 “Rule 41(a)(1)[(A)] allows a plaintiff to ‘dismiss an action without a court order by 25 filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion 26 27 1 28 Although the Parties specify Rule 41(a)(2), Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) appears to be the proper basis for dismissal. 1 3:23-cv-01528-RBM-LR 1 for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 2 appeared.’” Dougan v. Centerplate, Inc., Case No. 22-CV-1496 JLS (SBC), 2023 WL 3 8604152, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)). “Caselaw 4 concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a 5 stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” 6 Santos v. Quebecor World Long Term Disability Plan, Case No. 1:08-CV-565 AWI GSA, 7 2009 WL 3789214, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2009) (quotation omitted). 8 Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties’ Joint Motion is 9 GRANTED, and this entire action, including all causes of actions and claims for damages, 10 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and 11 costs. 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: January 6, 2025 _____________________________________ HON. RUTH BERMUDEZ MONTENEGRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:23-cv-01528-RBM-LR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?