Estate of Joe Anaya III et al v. Imperial County et al
Filing
30
Order On Joint Motion To Dismiss [ECF No. 29 ]. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 11/26/2024. (stn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
ESTATE OF JOE ANAYA III, by estate
representative Martha Anaya;
SAMANTHA ANAYA; J.A., a minor,
through his guardian ad litem, Pamela
Estrada; and M.A., a minor through her
guardian ad litem, Vanessa Muhebes,
18
IMPERIAL COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[ECF No. 29]
v.
19
21
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS
Plaintiffs,
16
17
Case No.: 23-cv-1670-RSH-LR
Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 29. The Motion
satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and is effective on filing. See Wilson v.
City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each Party is to bear its own fees and costs.
//
//
//
1
23-cv-1670-RSH-LR
1
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: November 26, 2024
____________________
Hon. Robert S. Huie
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
23-cv-1670-RSH-LR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?