La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp v. Windy City Paletas, et al

Filing 35

ORDER Submitting Defendants Partial Motion To Dismiss. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 06/03/2024.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjw)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
13

LA MICHOACANA PLUS ICE CREAM
PARLOR CORP, a California
corporation,

14

Plaintiff,

12

15

v.

16

22

WINDY CITY PALETAS, INC., a
California corporation; ECUAMEX
PALETAS, INC., a California
corporation; SKY LIMIT ENTERPRISES
II, INC., a Nevada corporation; KJAM
PALETAS, INC., a California
corporation; ARTURO MIRANDA, an
individual; KAYLA RINCON, an
individual; DIGMEY JARAMILLO, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 50,

23

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21

24
25
26
27
28

Case No.: 24-cv-00631-H-MMP
ORDER SUBMITTING
DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION
TO DISMISS

On April 15, 2024, Defendants Windy City Paletas, Ecuamex Paletas, Inc., Sky
Limit Enterprises II, Inc., KJAM Paletas, Inc., Arturo Miranda, Digmey Jaramillo, and
Kayla Rincon filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiff La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream
Parlor Corp’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to
1
24-cv-00631-H-MMP

1

state a claim. (Doc. No. 32.) On May 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to

2

Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 33.)

3

A hearing on Defendants’ motion is currently scheduled for Monday, June 10, 2024

4

at 10:30 a.m. The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1),

5

determines the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, submits the

6

motion on the parties’ papers, and vacates the hearing. Defendants’ reply brief remains

7

due by June 3, 2024.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 3, 2024
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
24-cv-00631-H-MMP