Passick v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

Filing 8

ORDER Granting Defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Developments Motion To Dismiss [ECF No. 7 ]. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/8/2024. (dim)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 In re: THE VIDA L. EDDY LIVING TRUST ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRADLEY PASSICK, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 16 Case No.: 24-cv-656-L-DDL 17 [ECF No. 7] Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the Court is Defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (5) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and insufficient service. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff did not oppose the motion within the time for filing an opposition or otherwise request additional time to respond. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1.e.2. HUD’s motion is therefore granted as unopposed. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1.f.3.c; Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). All claims asserted against Defendant HUD are dismissed without prejudice. // 1 24-cv-656-L-DDL 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2024 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 24-cv-656-L-DDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?