Galvez v. Colvin
Filing
12
Scheduling Order for Joint Motion for Judicial Review of Final Decision of The Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr on 03/10/2025.(mjw)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIO G.,1
Case No.: 25cv66-AGS (LR)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,2
15
SCHEDULING ORDER FOR JOINT
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
OF FINAL DECISION OF THE
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY
Defendant.
16
17
18
On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff Mario G. filed a civil Complaint against
19
Defendant, then Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn Colvin, seeking
20
judicial review of the denial of his application for social security disability and
21
supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant filed the Administrative
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court’s opinions in Social Security cases filed under
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) “refer to any non-government parties by using only their first name and last initial.”
1
2
Plaintiff named Carolyn Colvin, who was the Acting Commissioner of Social Security when Plaintiff
filed his Complaint on January 13, 2025, as a Defendant in this action. (See ECF No. 1 at 1.) Leland
Dudek is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and he is automatically substituted as a party
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d).
1
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
Record on March 10, 2025. (ECF No. 11.)
2
Pursuant to Rule 16.1(e)(3) of the Civil Local Rules, an Early Neutral Evaluation/
3
Case Management Conference is not required to be held in this case. The Court hereby
4
enters the following scheduling order:
5
I.
6
7
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
The parties shall engage in good faith settlement negotiations to resolve the matter,
according to the following schedule:
8
A.
On or before April 7, 2025, plaintiff shall prepare and deliver by e-mail to
9
the Special Assistant United States Attorney (“SAUSA”) representing the Commissioner
10
(or, if no SAUSA is assigned to the case, to the assigned Assistant United States Attorney
11
(“AUSA”)) a written and detailed proposal of settlement.
12
13
B.
On or before April 28, 2025, the Commissioner shall evaluate the merits of
plaintiff’s contentions and confer with plaintiff’s counsel in writing by mail or e-mail.
14
C.
15
No later than May 5, 2025, one of the following actions shall occur:
1.
16
remanding, or otherwise resolving the case; or
17
2.
18
19
The parties shall electronically file a stipulation dismissing,
The parties shall electronically file a Joint Status Report advising the
Court that they have not resolved the matter in settlement discussions.
II.
JOINT MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FINAL DECISION OF
20
THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
21
If the parties cannot resolve the matter in settlement discussions before the
22
deadlines set forth in this order, the parties shall electronically file a Joint Motion for
23
Judicial Review of Final Decision of The Commissioner of Social Security (“Joint
24
Motion for Judicial Review”) in the manner, and according to the schedule, set forth
25
below. Considering the Joint Motion for Judicial Review requirements set forth in this
26
order, the parties are hereby excused from Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6). The parties shall
27
cooperate in preparing the Joint Motion for Judicial Review, and sanctions may be
28
imposed for any failure to cooperate. A Joint Motion for Judicial Review that is not
2
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
signed by counsel for both parties may be rejected and stricken by the Court. A Joint
2
Motion for Judicial Review that is electronically filed, but that is not prepared in the
3
manner required by this order, may be stricken, and the parties will be required to cure
4
the defects by electronically filing an Amended Joint Motion for Judicial Review.
5
III.
CONTENT OF JOINT MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
6
The Joint Motion for Judicial Review shall include:
7
1.
Each party’s brief summary of the case;
8
2.
The parties’ positions with respect to the Administrative Law Judge’s
9
(“ALJ”) summary of the material medical evidence and testimony of record;
10
3.
Each party’s statement of the disputed issues;
11
4.
The parties’ contentions with respect to each disputed issue; and
12
5.
The parties’ statements of the relief requested.
13
Any issue not raised in the Joint Motion for Judicial Review may be deemed to
14
have been waived. The Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential
15
evaluation process, so the parties should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing
16
legal standards. Rather, the parties should focus on applying relevant and controlling
17
legal authority to the facts germane to each disputed issue.3 When citing cases, statutes,
18
regulations, Social Security Rulings, medical and vocational reference sources, or other
19
legal authority to support their legal arguments, the parties shall provide complete and
20
accurate citations to the portions of those authorities relied upon. The parties shall also
21
specify the evidence upon which they rely to support their contentions and provide
22
accurate page citations to the administrative record for all evidence relied upon [“AR
23
___”]. In addition, all medical terminology (including medical conditions, diagnoses,
24
procedures, tests, anatomical references, and pharmaceuticals) shall be defined in terms
25
26
27
28
3
The parties should cite only controlling case authority (i.e., decisions of the United States Supreme
Court or the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals). If there is no controlling authority, the decisions of other
courts may be cited.
3
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
understandable to a layperson, preferably by citation to a medical dictionary or glossary
2
from a standard reference work. The parties may not supplement the record beyond
3
definition of technical terms.
4
IV.
5
6
FORM OF JOINT MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Joint Motion for Judicial Review shall be prepared in the following format,
and shall comply with the local rules governing form and typeface:
7
a.
8
Summary of the Case
Each party shall provide a brief summary of the relevant background facts and
9
procedural history.
10
b.
Medical Evidence
11
Plaintiff shall state whether plaintiff will stipulate that the ALJ’s decision fairly
12
and accurately summarizes the material medical evidence and testimony of record. If
13
not, plaintiff shall either (a) specify the respects in which plaintiff contends the ALJ’s
14
decision misstates, mischaracterizes, or omits any of the material medical evidence
15
and/or testimony of record, or (b) state that the contentions of misstatement,
16
mischaracterization, or omission are addressed in the argument in support of the Joint
17
Motion for Judicial Review.
18
The Commissioner shall state whether the Commissioner will stipulate that the
19
ALJ’s decision fairly and accurately summarizes the material medical evidence and
20
testimony of record. If not, the Commissioner shall either (a) specify the respects in
21
which the Commissioner contends that the ALJ’s decision misstates, mischaracterizes, or
22
omits any of the material medical evidence and/or testimony of record, or (b) state that
23
the contentions of misstatement, mischaracterization, or omission are addressed in the
24
argument in support of the Joint Motion for Judicial Review.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
4
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
2
c.
Statement of Disputed Issues
Each party shall identify and frame, in a neutral fashion, each of the disputed
3
issues. [Example: “Issue No. 1 – Whether the ALJ properly evaluated plaintiff’s
4
subjective complaints of pain.”]
5
d.
6
Issues and Contentions
i. Issue No. 1 [The heading shall conform to the first issue listed in the
7
Statement of Disputed Issues.]
1. Plaintiff’s Contentions Regarding Issue No. 1 [Plaintiff shall
8
9
concisely set forth plaintiff’s contentions (including citations to
10
the page(s) of the administrative record recited evidence is
11
found, complete citations to relevant legal authority, and
12
definitions of medical terminology).]
13
2. The Commissioner’s Contentions Regarding Issue No. 1 [The
14
Commissioner shall concisely set forth The Commissioner’s
15
contentions (including citations to the page(s) of the
16
administrative record where cited evidence is found, complete
17
citations to relevant legal authority, and definitions of medical
18
terminology).]
19
3. Plaintiff’s Reply Regarding Issue No. 1 [Plaintiff may, but is
20
not required to, reply to the contentions actually raised by the
21
Commissioner; provided, however, that any such reply does not
22
exceed 56 continuous lines of text per issue.]
23
24
ii. Issue No. 2, etc. [Repeat the foregoing format as needed.]
e.
Relief Requested
25
i. Plaintiff’s statement of relief requested.
26
ii. The Commissioner’s statement of relief requested.
27
28
5
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
V.
2
FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
3
4
SCHEDULE FOR PREPARATION & FILING OF JOINT MOTION
The Joint Motion for Judicial Review shall be prepared and electronically filed
according to the following schedule:
5
A.
No later than June 5, 2025, plaintiff’s counsel shall prepare and deliver to
6
the SAUSA or AUSA a draft of plaintiff’s portions of the Joint Motion for Judicial
7
Review (prepared as described in section IV). Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide the
8
SAUSA or AUSA and the Office of Regional Counsel with a printed copy of plaintiff’s
9
portions of the Joint Motion for Judicial Review and two computer-readable electronic
10
copies on a USB thumb/flash drive or via e-mail (one electronic copy must be in an
11
editable word processing format, such as Microsoft Word, and the other electronic copy
12
should be in .pdf format). The draft of plaintiff’s portions of the Joint Motion for Judicial
13
Review shall comply with the format and content requirements set forth elsewhere in this
14
order.
15
B.
No later than July 7, 2025, the Commissioner shall provide to plaintiff’s
16
counsel the Commissioner’s portions of the Joint Motion for Judicial Review, and shall
17
deliver a printed and two computer-readable copies4 of the Commissioner’s portions of
18
the Joint Motion for Judicial Review to plaintiff’s counsel.
19
C.
No later than July 21, 2025, plaintiff’s counsel shall incorporate into the
20
Joint Motion for Judicial Review any reply that plaintiff may wish to make to the
21
Commissioner’s contentions, and shall deliver a completed copy of the Joint Motion for
22
Judicial Review signed by plaintiff to the SAUSA or AUSA for review, signature and
23
electronic filing. Plaintiff shall not use the reply to raise new issues that the
24
Commissioner has not had an opportunity to address.
25
26
27
As was required of plaintiff’s counsel, one electronic copy must be in an editable word processing
format, such as Microsoft Word, and the other electronic copy should be in .pdf format.
4
28
6
25cv66-AGS (LR)
1
2
D.
No later than July 28, 2025, the SAUSA or AUSA shall sign and
electronically file the Joint Motion for Judicial Review.
3
4
5
VI.
ORAL ARGUMENT
Unless otherwise ordered, the issues presented in any Joint Motion for Judicial
Review shall be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument.
6
VII. MOTIONS TO AMEND AND COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER
7
The deadlines set forth in this order are designed to give parties exercising
8
reasonable diligence sufficient time to perform the required acts without seeking
9
extensions of time. Accordingly, requests for extensions of time are discouraged. Any
10
motion requesting a modification of this scheduling order should be filed no less than
11
seven days in advance of the deadline(s) at issue and shall comply with Magistrate Judge
12
Lupe Rodriguez, Jr.’s Civil Chambers Rules (available on the district court’s website).
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 10, 2025
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
25cv66-AGS (LR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?