Montez, et al v. Romer, et al
ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER re: 3812 MOTION for Order to Protect Unalienable Rights for an Order for Certification filed by Cleotis Arnell Lewis (Claim No. 03-442). Claimant's petition and attachments will be referred to Judge Arguello for action. Claimant is granted up to and including 03/30/09 to submit any additional documents he wishes considered in support of his claim, by Special Master Richard M. Borchers on 02/10/09. (wjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 92-N-870 (OES) (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 96N343) JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, -vs.BILL OWENS, et al. Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ Claim Number 03-442 Category: III Claimant: Cleotis A. Lewis, #85892 Address of Claimant: CCCF, 6564 State Highway 96, Olney Springs, CO 81062 ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on Claimant's special appearance petition (Document #3812). This document is directed to Judge Robert Nottingham. Claimant is advised that Judge Edward Nottingham resigned his commission in late 2008 and has left the Court. The assigned judge now is Judge Arguello, and the petition will be referred to her for ruling. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant's petition and attachments will be referred to Judge Arguello for action; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimant is granted up to and including March 30, 2009 in which to submit any additional documents he wishes considered in support of his claim. SIGNED this 10th day of February, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ Richard M. Borchers ______________________________________ Richard M. Borchers Special Master
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?