Montez, et al v. Romer, et al

Filing 4173

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER re: Claimant Lawrence Fitzgerald (Claim No. 01-076). Claimant's 4164 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is accepted for filing and will be held in abeyance, by Special Master Richard M. Borchers on 10/23/2009. (wjc, ) Modified on 10/30/2009 to edit text to reflect Special Master (wjc, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, -vs.BILL RITTER, et al. Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ Claim Number 01-076 Category: I Claimant: Lawrence Fitzgerald, #66345 Address of Claimant: SCF, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling, CO 80751 ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on Claimant's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. #4164. Claimant acknowledges that he has previously filed a claim pursuant to Article XXXII of the Remedial Plan. That claim was dismissed on August 2, 2004. Claimant filed an objection to the final order. Judge Kane affirmed dismissal of the claim on October 2, 2006. Claimant has raised a number of issues that have occurred since August 27, 2003. Judge Kane has under advisement the issue of whether the Remedial Plan allows for the filing of pro se motions by inmates for individual relief. Until that issue is resolved, this motion will be held in abeyance. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is accepted for filing and will be held in abeyance. SIGNED this 23rd day of October, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ Richard M. Borchers ______________________________________ Richard M. Borchers Special Master

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?