Dillon v. Twin Peaks Charter, et al

Filing 101

COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christine M. Arguello: Jury Trial Day One held on 5/11/2009. DENYING 98 Order on Motion in Limine. GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Sequestration of Witnesses. (Court Reporter Darlene Martinez) (cmacd) (Modified on 5/13/2009 corrected typing error)(erv, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO Courtroom Deputy: Valeri P. Barnes Court Reporter: Darlene Martinez Date: May 11, 2009 Civil Action No. 99-cv-02462-CMA-BNB Parties: DAWN DILLON, Plaintiff, v. TWIN PEAKS CHARTER ACADEMY, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ______________________________________________________________________ HEARING: Jury Trial Day One 1:13 p.m. Court in session. Brent Case Holly Ortiz Counsel: Jack Olsen Diane Brown Also present: Plaintiff Dawn Dillon and defendant's client representative Principal BJ Buchmann. ORDER: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony Regarding Plaintiff's Medical Symptoms and Diagnosis (98) is denied. Ms. Dillon shall be permitted to introduce evidence regarding her general physical and mental condition; Ms. Dillon shall not be permitted to introduce evidence regarding medical causation or other matters that fall outside the realm of lay knowledge. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 41, 42, 46 and 47. Exhibits admitted by stipulation: ORDER: 1:35 p.m. 1:53 p.m. Defendant's Motion for Sequestration of Witnesses is granted. Court in recess. Court in session. Jury selection. Jury impaneled and sworn. ORDER: Jurors excused with direction to return May 12, 2009, at 9:45 a.m. 3:41 Court in recess/hearing continued. Total in-court time: 2:10 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?