Garcia v. Berkshire Life Ins, et al

Filing 490

ORDER :granting 486 Defendants Opposed Motion for Leave to Take Preservation Deposition of Craig Durkin. The defendants may take the deposition of Mr. Durkin and record it by videotape at such date and time as may be established by a notice of deposition and, if necessary, subpoena. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/18/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Case No. 04-cv-01619-LTB-BNB TINA GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, and THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a foreign insurance company, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on Defendants' Opposed Motion for Leave to Take Preservation Deposition of Craig Durkin [Doc. # 486, filed 10/27/2010] (the "Motion"). The Motion seeks an order allowing the defendants to conduct a preservation deposition of Craig Durkin for use at an evidentiary hearing on December 20, 2010. The Motion recites that Mr. Durkin is the "purported author of one of the documents whose falsity will be determined at the evidentiary hearing"; he lives in Washington, D.C., and is not subject to the subpoena power of this court; and his testimony is necessary. I ordered the plaintiff to respond to the Motion by November 17, 2010, but no response was received. Good cause being shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The defendants may take the deposition of Mr. Durkin and record it by videotape at such date and time as may be established by a notice of deposition and, if necessary, subpoena. Dated November 18, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?