USA v. 6575 Meade Court, et al

Filing 113

ORDER striking 111 Motion for Summary Judgment; striking 112 Motion for Default Judgment. No further filings will be accepted in this case. By Judge John L. Kane on 4/9/2014.(trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge John L. Kane
Civil Action No. 04-cv-1767-JLK-BNB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
v.
6575 MEADE COURT, ARVADA, COLORADO, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
Kane, J.
Although this matter has been fully adjudicated, pro se party Jaime Zapata-Hernandez
continues to file documents in this long-closed case. This must stop. The most recent filings (doc.
#111 and doc. #112) are STRICKEN. Mr. Zapada-Hernandez is attempting once again to declare
the un-appealed forfeiture Final Order and Judgment void. He is wrong on the facts and the law.
There is no basis whatsoever to re-open a forfeiture case that was disposed of by properly entered
Default Judgments and Final Orders of Forfeiture. To the extent that Mr. Zapata Hernandez believes
that he has some claim, however misguided it may be, against the U.S. Attorney’s office, he should
address that issue in a separate complaint. No further filings will be accepted in this case.
Dated: April 9, 2014
BY THE COURT:
S/John L. Kane
John L. Kane, Senior Judge
United States District Court