Hertz v. Luzenac America Inc

Filing 373

ORDER denying without prejudice 247 Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Experts Richard Whalen and Bruce Berglund ; and denying without prejudice 315 Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.s Alternative Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Richard Whalen as Being Moot and/or Irrelevant. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/18/2009.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Lewis T. Babcock, Judge Civil Action No. 04-cv-01961 - LTB - CBS SANFORD LEE HERTZ, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. LUZENAC AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, and THE LUZENAC GROUP, a French corporation, Defendants. And LUZENAC AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. LANE LIGHTHART, Counterclaim Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Experts Richard Whalen and Bruce Berglund [Doc # 247] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to refile by a date certain to be set by the magistrate judge; and 2. Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.'s Alternative Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Richard Whalen as Being Moot and/or Irrelevant [Doc # 315] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to re-file by a date certain to be set by the magistrate judge.

Dated: December 18 , 2009 in Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

-2-