Slusher v. Samu, et al

Filing 237

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix: Motion Hearing held on 2/8/2008. denying 225 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting 227 Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 228 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories or in the alternative Motion to Find Defendant Briggs in Default; (Court Reporter FTR-Ellen E. Miller.) (sah2, )

Download PDF
Slusher v. Reilly Doc. 237 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix Civil Action No.: 04-cv-02187-WDM-KLM FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A-501 Date: February 08, 2008 Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller ______________________________________________________________________________ FLOYD DAVID SLUSHER, #44260 Plaintiff(s), v. Pro Se (by telephone) ENDRE SAMU, et al Edmund M. Kennedy Defendant(s). ______________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ HEARING: MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 10:00 a.m. Court calls case. Telephonic appearance by Pro Se Plaintiff; in court appearance of counsel. The Court raises Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Motion for Extension of Time, and Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories or in the alternative Motion to Find Defendant Briggs in Default for argument. Discussion is held. It is ORDERED: Plaint iff's MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS [Docket No. 225, Filed January 02, 2008] is DENIED for the reasons set forth on the record. Plaintiff's MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME {Docket No. 227, Filed January 07, 2008] is GRANTED for the reasons set forth on the record. Plaintiff shall have to and including FEBRUARY 27, 2008 within which to file a written Supplemental Response to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 189]. Defendants shall have to and including MARCH 05, 2008 within which to file their written Reply, if any, regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 189]. At that time, the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be deemed fully briefed. It is ORDERED: Dockets.Justia.com 04-cv-02187-WDM-KLM Motions Hearing February 08, 2008 It is ORDERED: Plaint iff's MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES or in the alternative MOTION TO FIND DEFENDANT BRIGGS IN DEFAULT [Docket No. 228, Filed January 07, 2008] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As to INTERROGATORY NO. 2, that portion of the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall supplement his response on or before February 13, 2008. Supplement shall include a description of his duties as Chaplain. As to INTERROGATORY NO. 3, that portion of the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. It is noted the supplemental response provided to Interrogatory No. 5 also covers as a supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 3 As to INTERROGATORY NO. 4, that portion of the Motion is DENIED. As to INTERROGATORY NO. 5, that portion of the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. It is noted the Defendant has already provided a supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 5. As to INTERROGATORY NO. 6, that portion of the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall supplement their response on or before February 13, 2008. Supplemental response shall include information (1) as to who authorized Defendant Briggs' access to the computer system and (2) what types of information did he have access to during the relevant time frame of this litigation. Defendant is not required to respond as to whether or not he currently has computer access. As to INTERROGATORY NO. 7, As to INTERROGATORY NO. 8, As to INTERROGATORY NO. 9, As to INTERROGATORY NO. 10, that portion of the Motion is DENIED. that portion of the Motion is DENIED. that portion of the Motion is DENIED. that portion of the Motion is DENIED. Hearing Concludes. Court in recess: 10:20 a.m. Total In-Court Time: 00:20

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?