Hubbell v. Carney Brothers Construction, et al

Filing 579

ORDER granting 578 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend 578 Judgment. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/1/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 05-cv-00026-CMA-KLM PLATT T. HUBBELL, and KELLEY S. HUBBELL, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. CARNEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, a Colorado corporation, IAN CARNEY, RICHARD CARNEY, TEAMCORP, INC. d/b/a DRAFT TEK, a Colorado corporation, T.J. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation, and KERRY M. KARNAN, Third-Party Defendants. ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Amend Judgment (Doc. # 578). Upon review of the motion and the underlying documents relating to the motion, the Motion is GRANTED. The Court hereby ORDERS that the Clerk's Office amend the Judgment (Doc. # 568) to conform to the Court's order for entry of judgment (Doc. # 467) as follows: The last paragraph at the bottom of page 2, running from page 2 to page 3 of the Judgment, and beginning "FURTHER ORDERED that all of . . . ," shall be deleted and the following language shall be substituted: FURTHER ORDERED that the First and Second Claims for Relief (for Negligence and Negligent Misrepresentation) brought by Third-Party Plaintiffs Platt T. Hubbell and Kelley S. Hogan against the Third-Party Defendants Carney Brothers Construction, Ian Carney, and Richard Carney are merged into this Judgment and accordingly are deemed to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All remaining claims for relief brought by Third-Party Plaintiffs Platt T. Hubbell and Kelley S. Hogan against the Third-Party Defendants Carney Brothers Construction, Ian Carney, and Richard Carney are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED: November 01 , 2010 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?