Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nacchio et al
Filing
797
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held on 6/29/2010. ORDERED: Kozlowski's Motion to Strike Declaration # 681 is DENIED AS MOOT; Kozlowski' s Motion to Strike # 692 is DENIED AS MOOT; Woodruff's Motion to Strike # 695 is DENIED AS MOOT; Nacchio's Motion to Strike # 697 is DENIED AS MOOT; Mohebbi's Motion to Strike # 698 is DENIED AS MOOT. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No.: 05-cv-00480-MSK-CBS Date: June 29, 2010 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Linda Kahoe
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH P. NACCHIO, ROBERT S. WOODRUFF, AFSHIN MOEHBBI, JAMES J. KOZOLOWSKI, FRANK T. NOYES,
Polly Arlene Atkinson Thomas J. Krysa Christopher Friedman
Nathan H. Seltzer (via phone) David Meister Patrick J. Burke Jasmine M. Juteau Kevin D. Evans Phillip L. Douglass Forrest W. Lewis
Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ HEARING: PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Court in session: 9:58 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Mr. Seltzer appears via telephone. Also appearing is Caroline Lewis Wolverton from the U.S. Department of Justice for the U.S. Intelligence Community. Counsel review the proposed final pretrial order with the court. Discussion regarding stipulations. Discussion regarding pending motions, specifically #[681], #[692], #[695], #[697], and #[698]. Each of these motions address opinions or reports by Blaine Gilles. Based on Judge Krieger's previous ruling, defense counsel state these motions are moot. The court concurs with defense counsel.
ORDERED: Defendant James J. Kozlowski's Motion to Strike Declaration of Blaine Gilles and Information Relied Upon Therein, and Rule 7.1A Certification, doc #[681] is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED: James J. Kozlowski's Motion to Strike the Untimely and Improper "Expert Sur Reply Report of Blaine Gilles, Ph.D." and Information Relied Upon Therein, and Rule 7.1A Certification, doc #[692] is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED: Defendant Robert S. Woodruff's Motion to Strike the "Expert Sur Reply Report of Blaine Gilles, Ph.D" and Information Relied Upon Therein, and Rule 7.1A Certification, doc #[695] is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED: Defendant Joseph P. Nacchio's Motion to Strike the "Expert Sur Reply Report of Blaine Gilles, Ph.D." and Information Relied Upon Therein, and Rule 7.1A Certification, doc #[697] is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED: Defendant Afshin Mohebbi's Motion to Strike the "Expert Sur Reply Report of Blaine Gilles, Ph.D" and Information Relied Upon Therein, and Rule 7.1A Certification, doc #[698] is DENIED AS MOOT. Discussion regarding Motions in Limine. Discussion regarding witness lists. Discussion regarding exhibit lists. The court states there is substantially more work to be done. The court requests that the parties pare down, stipulate, and submit their best effort in the final version of the Proposed Final Pretrial Order. The next version should contain a final witness list, final exhibit list, and a correct recitation of all of the pending motions, if any. The court will strike any portions it feels is inappropriate. The court will set a deadline for the Proposed Pretrial Order, and will set a Pretrial Conference after Judge Krieger rules on any supplemental materials that the parties file in the next 30 days. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 10:59 a.m. Total time in court: 01:01
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?