Securities and Exchange Commission v. SeaLife Corporation et al

Filing 139

ORDER for Status Report by 6/22/2009. The plaintiff will file a Status Report with the court advising of the status of this matter by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 05/27/09. (jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 05-cv-00622-RPM SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS A. GLASER, BARRY S. GRIFFIN, and JEFFREY A. HAYDEN, Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT ____________________________________________________________________________ On October 17, 2008, a status conference was held in this matter as to the remaining three defendants after transfer of the claims against Sealife Corporation and Robert E. McCaslin to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The only appearance was Mr. Christopher Friedman on behalf of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Friedman advised that there were proposed settlement agreements awaiting approval from the Commission as to Defendants Barry S. Griffin and Jeffrey A. Hayden. On October 31, 2008, Defendant Douglas A. Glaser moved for an extension of time to respond to this Court's Order to Show Cause of October 20, 2008, which order was granted. On December 1, 2008, Douglas A. Glaser, pro se, requested a new settlement conference. There having been no other matters filed an no settlement having been submitted as to the defendants Griffin and Hayden, it is now ORDERED that on or before June 22, 2009, the plaintiff will file a status report with the court advising of the status of this matter. Dated: May 27th, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?