Zinna et al v. Jefferson County et al

Filing 390

ORDER re: 385 , 386 , 387 and 389 : in compliance with those directions, this court will consider the relevant papers on file with this court and the Court of Appeals, including the appellate briefs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/16/2012. (rpmcd )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01016-RPM
MICHAEL L. ZINNA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES CONGROVE, individually,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE ON REMAND
_____________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to the Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit and the opinion of that court directing that this court reconsider the plaintiff’s
motion for attorney’s fees, applying the three factors set forth in Farrar v. Hobby, 506
U.S. 103, 116-22 (1992) and the additional order of the appellate court granting the
appellant’s motion for attorney fees for this appeal with direction that this court
determine the amount of the award, it is
ORDERED that in compliance with those directions, this court will consider the
relevant papers on file with this court and the Court of Appeals, including the appellate
briefs.
DATED: October 16th, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge