Wilson et al v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC

Filing 3

ORDER granting plaintiff's motion to amend judgment. Signed by Judge Sidney B. Brooks on 1/23/06. (gms, )

Download PDF
Wilson et al v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC Doc. 3 Case 1:06-cv-00169-JLK Document 3 Filed 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO In re: WILLIAM DAVID WILSON SSN: XXX-XX-1260, and CHERYL ANN WILSON SSN: XXX-XX- 7799 Debtors. CHARLES SCHLOSSER, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, vs. DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NA, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CHAPTER 7 CASE NO. 04-32586 SBB Adversary Proceeding No. 05-1266 SBB ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT THIS COURT, having reviewed the Plaintiff Trustee's Motion to Amend Judgment (the "Motion") filed by Plaintiff Charles Schlosser, Chapter 7 Trustee herein ("Trustee") pursuant to Pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9059, which incorporates Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), good cause having been shown and being advised of the premises, hereby: ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Judgment (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #11) and Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #13) entered by the Court on January 3, 2006 in the above-captioned proceeding shall be amended to include a description of the Vehicle and its identification number and require Defendant to turn over the original title to the 2005 Chrysler Crossfire, VIN 1C3AN65L35X025621, to Trustee. In addition, judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff Trustee and against Defendant in the amount of $6,747.24 on Trustee's Second and Third Claims for Relief. Trustee is awarded his costs in the amount of $150.00. DATED: __________________. January 23, 2006 BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ The Honorable Sidney B. Brooks United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?